Monday, December 30, 2013

Anna Kryczka on "Fantastic Taxonomy and World-Building"



Fantastic Taxonomy and World-building
By: Anna Kryczka

“The urge to classify things is a fundamental human instinct; like the predisposition to sin, it accompanies us into the world at birth and stays with us to the end.”

Although paleontologist Tindall Hopwood was mainly referring to biological taxonomy when making this statement, the human need to classify extends far beyond organisms. Humans have classified everything in sight, including literature, leaving us with numerous genres. Since the categorization of literature is subjective, it is no surprise that the boundaries between genres are unclear. One distinction that is often misunderstood is the difference between high and low fantasy. 

At first glance, the definition of high and low fantasy may seem simple. Low fantasy stories take place in real-world-like settings which contain magical aspects that normal humans are unaware of. For example, in Neil Gaiman’s Neverwhere the real world exists completely oblivious to the presence of London below. On the other hand, high fantasy stories take place in fictional worlds that are unconnected to the real world. All characters are aware of the existence of magic. Till We Have Faces by SC Lewis is an example. The characters of this book live in a world ruled by gods who interact with mortals and cause supernatural events. 

Although it may seem simple, the distinction between high and low fantasy is not always clear. Writer Glen C Strathy believes “the difference has to do with the extent to which the story is set in the real world versus a world that is far removed from present reality.” (http://www.how-to-write-a-book-now.com/low-fantasy.html#sthash.QxJ7MywV.dpuf) Interaction between the real and supernatural world regularly occurs in low fantasy, while it is minimal or nonexistent in high fantasy. This is a problematic definition, for how is one to know how much interaction is necessary to cross the line from high to low fantasy.

While the definition is fuzzy, there are certain differences in world-building that are commonly associated with each subgenre. One difference lies in how the reader is introduced to the magical world. In high fantasy readers usually immediately find themselves engulfed in an unfamiliar world and it is up to them to make sense of it all. The entry into unfamiliar territory is more gradual in low fantasy. The story switches between the real world and the magical world so readers often find themselves on familiar footing. Also, low fantasy often features a character from the real world who is pulled into the supernatural world along with the reader, giving the reader a companion who is also trying to comprehend their surroundings. 

The differences between the two subgenres give authors different options for world-building. The key to successful world-building is to introduce the reader to unfamiliar conceptswithout disrupting the plot to offer long, awkward explanations. For example, in Till We Have Faces Orual describes her feelings in the presence of the Priest of Ungit by writing “I think what frightened me… was the holiness of the smell that hung around him - a temple-smell of blood (mostly pigeons’ blood, but he had sacrificed men, too)” (11). Without interrupting the flow of the story, this passage explains that Orual lives in a religious kingdom where people fear gods and regularly make sacrifices to please them.
World-building in low fantasy is different. For example, Neverwhere features a character, Richard, who begins the book as part of London above before being sucked into London below. He is faced by a new world governed by rules he does not understand. Sometimes his companions provide him with information. For example, Anaesthesia tells the story of how she slipped into London below and informs him that “nobody ever gets both” worlds (88). Form this conversation Richard learns about the nature of the world he has slipped into. As Richard learns more throughout his journey, the reader shares the learning experience.

Readers of fantasy must go through a process of becoming accustomed to a new world. In high fantasy, they are forced to do this on their own. In low fantasy, the reader has a character such as Richard who is going through a similar experience and can guide the reader’s thoughts. As a result, the reader feels a more intimate connection with characters in low fantasy, and feels more like an observer when reading high fantasy. To conclude, the differences in the setting of high and low fantasy offer different options for world-building and in turn affect how the reader experiences the story.

1 comment:

  1. (Psst -- Anna! It's "C.S. Lewis"!)

    I'm glad to see you pulling in some of your own sources to put a more specific and personal stamp on your response -- and I think the urge to classify you point out through biological taxonomy is fundamental to human nature, just as you say. To know what something is seems to us a way of mastering it; maybe that's why "nobody ever gets both" London Above and Below? Too much knowledge and mastery? As for Orual's story, perhaps her problem is the same. She can't know the world of the gods and the world of men at once -- can't occupy both as Psyche has - and that becomes the source of her jealousy and fear. It's a lack of mastery, or of understanding.

    ReplyDelete