How an Orphaned
Teenage Girl is so Similar to a Young Man in London
By Hannah Sambor
Low-fantasy is simply
put a more relatable friend of high-fantasy. The less changed a setting is, the
more similar it is to our current world. However, without the main character
(or hero) low-fantasy would not be a close friend of high-fantasy. I find the
setting to be the only difference between the two, while the two heroes’ characterization
is almost a spitting identical. The Blue
Sword, written by Robin McKinley, and Neverwhere,
written by Neil Gaiman, together show the character similarity and setting
diference between low and high fantasy novels.
First off, their
relatable aspects derive from their difference in setting. The setting between
low fantasy and high fantasy are on opposite ends. High-fantasy is an entire
new world, while low-fantasy blends in a strange new world with our world we
are already familiar with.
The characters in both
stories, in a sense, are unexpected heroes. Richard in Neverwhere is much more relatable than Harry is in The Blue Sword. Richard is a man in his
20’s living in London. Harry however because she is a young orphan girl moving
across countries to live with adopted parents, doesn’t come across as an
average and therefore a relatable teenage girl. Richard is more relatable. More
often than not, society would expect Richard’s life to be pretty common. In
all, he is of the middle class. Harry yet sticks out of the story as a unique
and insightful girl. Richard is still stuck in a dead-end job and a stressful
engagement. The setting determines their relatable characteristics. The very
essence of low-fantasy is relatable and in turn makes its characters more
relatable.
The overall
characterizations, such as motivation, spirit, goals, and a secret talent, never
fail to be true with the very familiar “chosen one.” The author in most fantasy
novels, regardless of high or low, will have a central hero character that
embarks on Joseph Campbell’s Journey of a Hero. Below is the info graphic for the
seventeen stages. I received this copy from The Dark Forest blog.
Depicted above are the
seventeen stages of a hero’s journey in the viewpoint of Joseph Campbell,
American writer and mythologist. Credited to http://darkforestfairytales.blogspot.com/2012/09/infographic-joseph-campbells-heros.html.
Notice the first
stage: Call to Adventure. It clearly states in the description, “to head off
into the unknown.” Both Richard and Harry do so in their respective situations.
Richard, by some inner calling, picks up hurt and helpless Door lying on the
sidewalk at night. He feels the NEED to help her, instead of doing what his
fiancé wishes and leave the girl to her inevitable future. On the other hand,
King Corlath spots Harry in particular out of all the others at the Residency.
On page 39 in The Blue Sword, he
“looked up abruptly, as if from some unfathomable depth of thought, and saw
her: their eyes met.” Because of some unimaginable power both Richard and Harry
are called to ‘the unknown’ in their special ways. The people in which call
them to their adventures are also their portals. Contact with Lady Door, the
eldest daughter of respectable Lord Porticio, figuratively escorts Richard into
London Below. Because of how involved he has already become, there is no going
back to his predictable, yet comforting life. Corlath, just like Door, is of
high prestige being the King and of the Hills. Harry immediately gets access to
his tent, or zotar in Hill tongue. His servants treat her as if she is of royal
blood, which ironically, because she is an Outlander, we find out to be true
the entire time.
Moving along with the
hero’s characterizations, Richard deals with an awful lot of confusion while
Crossing the Threshold (Campbell’s fourth stage). On page 46 already Richard
has to stop and wonder where he is in London Below. Matched with this sense of
curiosity is his ignorance. The marquis points out on page 143, “’What a
refreshing mind you have, young man,’ he said. ‘There really is nothing quite
like total ignorance, is there?’” While Richard is supposed to be an
undefeatable hero in the end, the journey is quite rough. He never gets a talk
about the birds and the bees of London Below. For being the main character, he
is quite ignorant to his situation. Harry experiences a similar absence of
knowledge like Richard’s. She is never told much about the laprun trials or why
she is so important to the Hill people until she is already honorable
Harimad-sol.
The two main
characters, while because they live in such different worlds, differ in their
relatable aspects. But, because they both belong to fantasy worlds, are very
similar in the Journey of a Hero.
So, I wonder: Is Richard supposed to be "an undefeatable hero" by the end of his story? Certainly Harry of _The Blue Sword_ very much fits that description as she evolves, but while Richard loses some of his naivete and pedestrian way of seeing the world, he hardly turns into a true warrior. It seems that luck and faith save him in his very brief battle with the Beast of London, and ultimately, Door plays the part of the self-rescuing princess. There's a distinct journey toward heroism, but I think these stories are telling us something quite different about what it takes to become a hero. Harry is a product of real destiny. Richard seems to be a rather ordinary man who rises to his circumstances.
ReplyDelete