Defining Fantasy Through Tolkien’s Looking Glass
By: Jennifer Kwon
I
personally favor low fantasy novels than high fantasy novels because the world
presented in low fantasy novels usually mirrors the world that I live in except
it contains magical elements. High fantasy novels are great too, but the world
that is introduced to me is far different than the one I know, a separate
reality. The world in low fantasy novel is one that I can make more connections
with because I am plunged into a familiar world rather than a total foreign
one.
But what
makes a book high or low fantasy in the first place?
Well,
according to Tolkien, three key aspects of stories exist in the “fairie” world:
recovery, escape, and consolation. These three aspects are present in both The
King of Elfland’s Daughter
by Lord Dunsany and in Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman. These three
aspects are present in each story and they’ve helped me define what is low or
high fantasy.
So recovery is different for both
stories. In Dunsany’s story, the main character already knows that magic exist
and so in this case, the character doesn’t need to recover that childhood
belief in magic. More so, it is the reader who mostly recovers the belief in
magic than the character. In Gaiman’s story, however, the main character
recovers that childhood belief in magic and convinces himself to believe along
with the reader. Both the character and the reader become open to the magic
around them.
In The King of Elfland’s Daughter, people know that magic exists and
Alveric’s quest begins because the people want to be ruled by magic. This sets
him off to marry the Elf King’s daughter and he ventures into Elfland, a world
of mystical power. On the other hand, in Neverwhere,
Richard’s life is as normal as it gets. He has a stable job, a house, and a
girlfriend. But as soon Door comes in, he suddenly becomes a resident of her
world, London Below, where magic is omnipresent.
Furthermore,
in a high fantasy book, escape is more exploring deeper into the magical world,
the one that the main character lives in. For example, in Dunsany’s book,
Alveric goes on a search for Elfland, venturing toward North into the unknown
lands as he tries to retrace his steps to get back Lirazel.
Escape in a low fantasy novel is when the
character finally falls into the magical world, leaving behind the modernistic
world. In Gaiman’s book, the main character, Richard, “falls through the
cracks” into London Below, away from the mundane world, where he has become a
resident of. In such a low fantasy novel, the character and I are not that far
apart since we both plunge into a whole new world at the same time. Meaning, we
are at eye-level throughout the experience.
Finally, consolation is in different
forms in these two books. Consolation in high fantasy is when the plot is
resolved and everything reverts back to normal. In Dunsany’s case, Orion and
his parents are reunited once again and Earth and Elfland merge together. Consolation in a low fantasy novel is when the
main character returns to the normal world and his quest comes to end. In
Gaiman’s book, Richard gets his old life back and becomes a resident of Above
London once again, even though in the end, he chooses to go back to London
Below where he feels happiest in.
So how
do I determine if a book is high or low fantasy?
It’s simple. I figure out whether a
book is low or high depending on my connection with the main character. If I
feel like I know just as much as the character knows about the world they fall
into, then I consider that to be low fantasy novel. If the character has more
knowledge of the magical world than I do, then I consider that to be high
fantasy novel. Anyway, most fantasy books contain Tolkien’s three elements:
recovery, escape, and consolation. How their authors work with three aspects
can define whether the novel is low or high fantasy. Through Tolkien’s looking
glass, low fantasy equates the reader with the main character while in high
fantasy, the connection between the character and the reader is further apart.
Jennifer, I think you might have misunderstood to what Tolkien's "Faerie story" framework refers. You see, recovery, escape, and consolation are the phases of the reading experience *the reader* of fantasy stories undergoes; if you want to talk about the phases of the characters' experiences, that's what Campbell's monomyth and Hero's Journey are about. In trying to break your texts down so that Orion / Alveric / Lirazel or Richard are shown passing through recovery, escape, or consolation, you're confusing their role with YOUR role as reader. By witnessing their experiences and accompanying them through them, we can experience these things ourselves, but ultimately, Tolkien's point was that fantasy is definable as fantasy not for what the story strictly contains (think Campbell here) but for what it does in a reader's brain and heart.
ReplyDelete