Time’s Children and Summer Dreams
By
Andrew Salij
Speculative
fiction (sf) has generally been divided into two genres: fantasy and science
fiction. Let’s examine their reasoning for the distinction between the two. It can be tempting to say that one knows
science fiction or fantasy when one sees it, but only the Supreme Court can get away with that kind of sloppy reasoning. One better explanation
comes from the director of Guardians of
the Galaxy, James Gunn, who notes, “the difference between fantasy and
science fiction lies in the fact that fantasy takes place in a world in which
the rules of everyday experience do not apply, and science fiction in the world
of everyday experience extended” [1].
Fantasy is outside of the laws of our world, and science fiction is set in an
extension of the world as we know it. This would be a great explanation if it
were only not so limited. Where does one put Star
Wars on this
dichotomy? Is it science fiction because interstellar travel is an extension of
humankind’s space technology or is it fantasy because of the mystical Force? I
will build upon Gunn’s explanation because has some truth to it. Science
fiction examines the possibilities created through man’s will and brain while
fantasy examines the potential unlocked through supernatural power and the
human spirit.
In a work of science fiction, new creation is born in the
crucible of human ingenuity. Humanity explores and tempers the unknown, making
things that are possible. Similarly to Gunn’s definition, science fiction takes
what is everyday experience, adds the possible technology, social systems, and
environments as imagined by man, and tells a story using this new world. Key
works of science fiction rely upon this idea. In Enders
Game, for example,
all of the human technology is advanced technology of that which already
exists. Furthermore, Ender manipulates the world by using his intelligence to
destroy the antagonistic buggers. Science fiction embraces the intellect and
cries out that it can morph existence. Yet, this change need not be beneficial.
Dystopian fiction proves a key example of how mankind can create horrors.
Aldous Huxley’s science fiction classic Brave
New World shows that a
society made through social engineering can have nefarious ends. Just because
science fiction brings to life the creations of human ingenuity does not mean
that such creations aid humanity.
On the contrary, fantasy focuses on how the supernatural and
the human spirit create situations outside the possibilities of the mundane
world. The supernatural, which concerns that which cannot be explained, is
inherently antithetical to human rationality. Therefore, it cannot be created
or even adequately described by the human brain, putting it in stark contrast
with the creations of science fiction. Rather, the supernatural influences the
world through typically impossible means that are often called “magic.” A
reader of fantasy must not try to explain the supernatural in fantasy and just
simply believe it [2].
In reading fantasy, one embraces the impossible in order to escape to a new
realm. The worlds of fantasy support the idea that human creation is limited.
For example, the cities of elves (or other generally benevolent magical creatures)
often provide a utopia that contrasts with the creations of humanity. Even when
humanity is celebrated in fantasy, this typically only occurs in relation to a
human’s soul and not their brain. The heroes of fantasy often develop strong
spirits such as that of the enlightened Eragon
of the Inheritance Series. The hero’s
journey, which is often used in fantasy, even has a spiritual mastery of both
the supernatural and human worlds as one of its central tenets [3].
Rationality can lead to greed and corruption, but one who values the
fantastical can remain pure. Fantasy values the unknowable over the conquerable
and the spirit over the mind, making it separate from science fiction.
By appreciating this difference between fantasy and
science fiction, we enable readers to consume the type of literature that
benefits them. An engineer seeking inspiration should look to science fiction
in order to find examples of what the human mind can create, but someone
seeking spiritual growth should read something without the constraints of reality.
Genre descriptions should not be purely mechanical (e.g., zombie stories
contain zombies), for such categories fail to address the underlying reason why
one is reading a work. In creating a divide between science fiction and
fantasy, we allow readers to fulfill their literary needs and writers to create
works that are suited towards helping them.
Andrew,
ReplyDeleteI particularly like the idea of readers seeking stories that BENEFIT them. There may be no more essential statement out there about not just what to read, but why. Pleasure is a benefit. Knowledge is a benefit. So are hope, and consolation, and surprise, and catharsis, and the cold-water-to-the-face of unendurable tragedy... at least, to a certain way of thinking. Well done here.
NB, though: James Gunn? Yes, there was a James Gunn who directed _GotG_. But the James Gunn you read is a completely different guy, I'm afraid!
Best,
TT