We
Are One
By
Grace Duan
I have never
personally read the Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. The only exposure
I have had with the story was watching a high school production of the musical
and an Arthur episode featuring a
song sung by a 3rd grade anthropomorphic bear genius. (It’s quite
catchy, check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiB4dMwDFtg). Still, like
much of the rest of the unread public, I am aware with the core concept of the
classic: that existence is often multifaceted.
A
key point that is often missed in the original story of Jekyll and Hyde is that
there is no Mr. Hyde. They are the
same man acting on different urges and expressing himself through different
actions. I would say that the relationship between fantasy and science fiction
is similar: they are one and the same as well, just two embodiments of
speculative fiction. While fantasy is often recognizable by talking animals and
mystical creatures and science fiction is marked by futuristic technologies and
dystopian societies, they are fundamentally based on the human imagination of
what could exist. In “Toward a
Definition of Science Fiction,” James Gunn makes the distinction that “fantasy
creates its own world and its own laws; science fiction accepts the real world
and its laws”. In both cases, we learn about our own world through those
speculative worlds.
If these genres
were people, science fiction would be a social introvert and fantasy would be a
shy extrovert. While these descriptions appear to be oxymoronic and
contradictory, they fairly accurately describe the big picture they present to
the reader. Science fiction practices abeyance, holding back on information as
an introvert would, and it emphasizes the implications of the society on the
individual. Fantasy, on the other hand, is accessible, as an extrovert is, but
takes time to understand. It tends to focus on the impact individuals on the
rest of the world. While science fiction likes to stay within the rules of the
familiar world, fantasy likes to stray into impossibilities. Where science
fiction has a pessimistic attitude and a pervading fear of the unknown, fantasy
embraces the unfamiliar with positive feelings of hopefulness and longing.
Philip Martin
explains in “Fantasy and Belief” that “fantasy looks inward, not to the rules
of social or personal behavior but into our beliefs. In fantasy, wonder and
wishes overcome knowledge and explanation”. In contrast, the popular view of
science fiction is that it creates worlds with practical, mathematical, and
logical explanations. This, however, is not always the case. Even if we
consider elements of science fiction as realistically “possible”, we may not
understand exactly how they work and whether they are, in fact, possible. In
this sense, science fiction is very much like fantasy itself. The British
science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke makes a valid point: “Any sufficiently
advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
Look at Roger
Zelazny’s novel Lord of Light as an
example. In the story, the elite group of people had adopted the personas of
the Hindu pantheon through advanced technology. They take on the powers of the
divine and rule over the rest of society who believe in the legitimacy of their
power. The mystery and ambiguity behind the source of their power is
equivalent to magic. Zelazny never explains the mechanisms of the technology… and there may be no acceptable explanation. Then, is this story really soft science fiction? Or is it borderline fantasy?
The creator of
this depiction of Jekyll and Hyde challenges the viewer: “You have to decide
which is which.” Just like deciding for ourselves which face is Jekyll and
which is Hyde, we must also answer this question on our own: Can we really draw
the line between these two facets of speculative fiction, or are their differences
so vague that they are interchangeable and equal?I believe that the answer lies in the
way fantasy and science fiction affects each individual reader. For me, science
fiction evokes questions values of humanity and society. Fantasy makes me more
aware of my own values and sense of self. That is where I draw the line between
the two… But it must be noted that it is not a boundary line. The distinction is not terribly important, as it all
boils down to the lessons we learn about ourselves and our world through the
exploration of different ones.
Grace:
ReplyDeleteRejecting the idea of boundaries in favor of styles that invite a certain perspective or way of thinking really puts the proverbial ball back in the reader's court. Your use of Jekyll and Hyde as a metaphor becomes especially significant with that final visual, where it's up to the viewer to decide which face is which. Artfully done, Grace (no pun intended).
Best,
TT