Making It Up
by
Megan McKeown
In my mind, whenever I am asked the
question of whether a piece of writing is sci-fi or fantasy, I automatically
try to decide whether the piece is based more on technology and science or on
magic. But, this is just the question my
brain has been trained to ask since I learned what these genres were as a
munchkin. This question can become
particularly hard to answer as certain scientific advancements become hard to
believe, or as magic becomes explained in a more and more rational way. It’s hard to draw a straight line between
science fiction and fantasy, but there are some certain aspects of each genre
that can be looked at in order to sort a piece of literature into one of these
two categories.
I think that too often, fantasy is
associated with just being magical.
Fantasy may have a tendency to lean in a more magical direction,
however, I don’t believe that this is what makes it fantasy. In a fantasy story, the author has invented a
new world that is, although not necessarily completely different from our
world, definitely original. There
doesn’t have to be “magic” in the traditional sense, but it should consist of
at least one element that is completely from the mind of the author. The world can draw inspiration from something
in the world that we live in, but is really the product of the author’s
imagination. As a result, fantasy tends
to be more trippy
and difficult to believe.
The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkein is a
very clear example of fantasy. Although
the setting may be inspired by the ever so majestic mountains
of Switzerland, Middle Earth, as well as the vast majority of creatures
inside it, come completely from Tolkein’s imagination. If the story actually did take place in the Swiss
mountains, and all the creatures were all humans, and the dragon was something
scary we have in this world (like a
monkey with Ebola), a case could be made for this as a sci-fi story. However, at this point the book had to be
manipulated so much to take place in some time in our world that it lost all of
the elements that make it unique. It
isn’t the story anymore. Thus, it could
not take place in any version of our world, and is considered fantasy.
I am in no way trying to say that
sci-fi is unoriginal, but merely that the setting for a fantasy piece, although
it can be inspired, is imagined. For
sci-fi, I think that the story is set in our world in a different set of
circumstances. It takes our reality and
extrapolates on it in order to create something unique. In a sci-fi story, a reader should be able to
believe that in some other time, when man technological advancements and social
changes have taken place, the events of the story could have taken place.
It is very easy to come up with
examples of literature that makes using this idea to determine the genre very
hard to do. For example, Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman is set up in the real world. It is, in fact, set in the very real city of
London. However, London Below is not
something that could happen in our world, no matter what kind of technology
there is to help us out. Thus, this
would still be considered fantasy.
Another borderline story to
consider is Ray Bradbury’s “The Million-Year Picnic”, which follows a family settling on Mars. In this case, I would call this science
fiction. Although it technically isn’t
our world as in our planet, this story still takes place in a futuristic
version of our universe. Theoretically,
sometime in the future, all of Earth could turn to ruins. In this case, if a family owned a private
space ship, they could fly it to Mars.
And if there had been previous settlement attempts, they could come
across things such as abandoned cities as they did in the story. In this way, although it is definitely a
stretch, a world in which this is the case is imaginable. Therefore, I would label this story as
sci-fi.
I think that fantasy is the
invention of the author, while sci-fi is the author creating a situation based
on our world. With the right changes,
sci-fi could happen sometime in the future.
However, fantasy is straight up impossible. This is the number one way that I distinguish
fantasy from sci-fi.
Megan:
ReplyDeleteI think specifying that magic is only part of what might characterize a fantasy text is a good move, as there are many fantasy works where magic is so sublimated or simply not truly present that the nature of what is "fantastic" lies elsewhere: in setting, races, cultures, and so on. The sand-trap of saying that sf is derived from the real world is, of course, the various sf texts that aren't set in that world. Anne Leckie's _Ancillary Justice_ is set in a universe 100% different from ours, with no corresponding cultures or histories (except insofar as the core culture of the world could be seen as a kind of space-Roman-empire). Is it about taking a different core from reality and transplanting that into another reality (a future, an alt-history, an alternate universe, period?), one that embraces some attitude or rationality specifically?
Best,
TT