Elves
with Ray Guns: Differentiating Science Fiction and Fantasy
By
Milan Shah
Before
I begin to discuss my distinction between the two types of Speculative Fiction,
I should first answer why it matters. I believe that the distinction between
science fiction and fantasy exists primarily to make the jobs of the readers
easier. One thing that we, as humans, like to do is label things and categorize
them. We give pretty much everything a name, I mean we’ve even named the metal parts of our pencils!
We’ve also given unique organisms their own little place in a collection of
collections of even more collections of things within our world. By doing
this, we are able to refer to different things easily. This is the same as we
are doing for science fiction and fantasy, by having different names the reader
can look for things that specifically appeal to them.
In
order to make seeing the distinction easier, let’s first examine the
similarities. The easiest one to see is that both science fiction and fantasy
can have something similar to Joesph Campbell’s hero’s
journey. Though it’s mostly associated with fantasy, we can see through
Anakin’s or Luke’s journey in Star Wars
that it can exist in science fiction as well. Similarly, authors of both can
use creatures of their own creation in their stories. Fantasy has elves,
dwarves, orcs, etc., while science fiction typically has any form of life that
the author chooses and can place them under the label extraterrestrial. But
there is no reason that the two can’t mix. Science fiction writers could make
their extraterrestrials elves or other fantastic creatures, and there certainly
isn’t any rule that says that a fantasy writer can’t have something like a
wookie as part of the worlds they create (aside from copyrights and such of
course). Furthermore, both science fiction and fantasy can have other worlds
within their stories. Generally, in science fiction this is done through the
use of multiple planets, like in The Lost
Stars or, once again, Star Wars,
while in fantasy it is done through portals of some sort, like in Neverwhere or the Pendragon series. However, both can also exist within a single
world or our own given world.
So
with all these similarities it’s understandable why it’s difficult to
distinguish between the two. Some people may think like Leigh,
where if you have elves or other fantasy tropes it is fantasy, but if you add
technology it becomes science fiction. However, I personally believe that the
key difference lies in what makes each of their world(s) work. When a story’s world(s) functions because of
magic or some form of it, the story is primarily fantasy. If it’s due to
technology then the story is science fiction. However, defining it like this
brings up a few immediate questions.
First,
what about Clarke’s
three laws? What happens when the technology looks just like magic? Well,
look at how the technology is described? If the technology is well explained
and extremely intricate, I would consider it to be science fiction, such as in Lord of Light. If it is not super
detailed, then we have to consider if we can take the technology away. In
stories such as Iron Man series, we
could replace all his technology with some sort of magic with its own rules
then it can be called fantasy.
The
second question comes up actually about stories like Star Wars, what happens when you have a lot of technology and
magic? In Star Wars there is
technology, mainly through the spaceships, and magic, through the force, so why
is it science fiction. In these cases look at the elements removing them one at
a time. Let’s say we take out the technology from Star Wars. Then, we would
have a similar story however, just taking place via portals or on the same
world. However if we take out the magic from the story, we would essentially
have the same plot and the same setting, and not much would change over all.
That is why we can consider Star Wars to
be science fiction under this definition. With that in mind, let’s consider a
story that somehow involves elves and ray guns. Would it be science fiction or
fantasy? Well in this case it would be science fiction, since there is nothing
suggested about magic. However, if there was some sort of elfish magic that was
far more important than the guns it certainly would be fantasy.
Milan,
ReplyDeleteI find your observation about Tony Stark/Iron Man and replacing his technology with magic, thus making it fantasy, interesting and also potentially problematic. It's problematic insofar as the comment assumes magic and tech "mean" the same thing. According to Clarke's Third Law, they are "indistinguishable," but that's really more in terms of how or if they can be understood by laymen and if they create similar effects.
I think there's also the consideration of WHY Iron Man is a tech-based rather than a magic-based figure. The answer seems to come down to brains, pure and simple. He's gifted in a way almost ANYONE could be gifted. With education, brilliance, and money, Tony Stark changes his world. If he were a magician, then suddenly, there's no up-from-nothing son of an immigrant story there anymore. There's just giftedness of a totally unreachable kind. So I think the Third Law helps us see the interchangeability as a matter of principle, but I think it can't account for the meaning of magic versus tech to a character or their world.
If you think about it, that's the reason tech and magic co-exist in SW: to make something that, despite phenomenal ray guns and star ships, only the rarest and most elite of people can ever obtain (magic through the Force). It's the giftedness of destiny and prophecy and pure nature, not of ingenuity. Han Solo is all gadgets and know-how and derring do. Luke is heart and soul and destiny. Han can never be Luke because he's basically Tony Stark in poor smuggler's clothes, and really, we wouldn't want him to be, right? It's that scrappy quality that comes from being self-made that makes him so utterly identifiable.
Best,
TT