The Genealogy of
Genres
By
Megan Roller
Fiction
is the large umbrella into which we throw the literature that does not quite
follow all the rules of our world. Anyone who likes fiction has their own
specific preferred sub genres and or combinations of sub genres. However, there
is no simple formula for creating and organizing fiction. The species of
fiction comes in many breeds and many books are mutts. This makes categorizing
the specific organisms very difficult. But given that the breeds of a species are
still perfectly capable of breeding; does the difference really matter?
Since
there are too many breeds of this species, science fiction and fantasy will be
the main examples. The science fiction breed is characterized as the fiction
that explores changes in the rules within relative reason; while fantasy
blatantly tosses the rules with little or no explanation. Nevertheless both of
these breeds tend to form hybrids that are so well blended that classification
become near impossible.
Such
is the problem with colors; where exactly does red become orange? Many art programs alleviate this problem by
using three main colors and changing the concentration until the desired shade
is reached. Therefore how can we draw a line between science fiction and
fantasy? Why would we?
The
main reason that people desire this differentiation is to increase their
ability to find what they want with more ease. But each of these books has many
traits that show it to belong to many of the breeds of Fiction. For instance I
would primarily classify George R. R. Martin’s A Game of Thrones as historical fiction as the lifestyle of the
characters mostly resembles my favorite eras of history. Yet it could also also
see it as being classified as fantasy (due to mythical creatures), horror (due
to the devastating nature of the plot), or realistic (people don’t live through
things that would kill them). However one could probably argue that it belongs
to even more breeds.
Due
to the subjective nature of interpreting literary works and the lack of a
formulaic nature, books cannot be distinctly and undisputedly categorized. A
valid way of categorizing accurately and concisely with words has yet to be
developed. Therefore it is my belief that we should color code these books with
different shades to show how strong each of the aspects are.
Megan:
ReplyDeleteI confess I'm a little unsure of whether you're being serious in your "we should color code these books" finale... If you are serious, how could coding of this kind help? One would still need to identify the various genres a work of fiction seems to resemble, and then develop some color that represents these in a theoretically correct measure? If you aren't being serious, then are you just saying that trying to decide what's pure-bred and what's a mutt matters nary a bit, so long as there's four legs and a happy, lolling tongue?
Best,
TT