Blurred
Line
By
Dayvon
Snell
Science
fiction contains things that could happen in our given world, despite some of
the phlebotinum used. Although some fantasy uses scientific theories to explain
story elements, there is no possible way that many of the events could occur in
reality. If I had to draw a line between the two, I would have to say that science
fiction expands on the possibilities in our world, while fantasy goes beyond
them. This line has become increasingly blurry since the creation of these two
genres, making it progressively difficult to define the difference between the
two genres.
In
Speculations on Speculation, James
Gunn gives us a definition of science fiction. He says that “Science fiction is
the branch of literature that deals with the effects of change on people in the
real world as it can be projected into the past, the future, or to distant
places. It often concerns itself with scientific or technological change, and
it usually involves matters whose importance is greater than the individual or
the community; often civilization or the race itself in danger.” His use of
words such as “often” and “usually” shows the inability to make up his mind
because of the similarities present in fantasy and science fiction. He also
describes science fiction as “a fantastic event of development considered
rationally,” even further displaying the existence of the blurred line between science
fiction and fantasy. The word “rationally” does, however, imply a difference.
In
Philip Martin’s A Guide to Fantasy
Literature, he describes three aspects that exist in fantasy. One of these
aspects is Escape. It refers to “leaving behind the restraints of a modernistic
world.” This aspect of fantasy is commonly shared with science fiction as well.
Even though many characteristics of our given world are present in science
fiction, readers get to escape to a different world because of the postulated ideas.
In DC comics, both science fiction and fantasy are used to entertain the
audience. For example, The Flash, a character with super-speed, gained his
powers through a lab accident involving a particle accelerator. Another
character, Superman, wholly comes from the fictitious planet Krypton. The unity
of these characters as they save the world demonstrates that both science
fiction and fantasy can exist in the same medium.
The
best description of the difference between the two genres, in my opinion, is
presented by Miriam Allen deFord. She is quoted saying, "Science fiction consists of improbable possibilities, fantasy of
plausible impossibilities." However, I don’t think a definite line
between science fiction and fantasy needs to be drawn because neither of these
two genres have concrete definitions. The similarities between the two can far
outweigh any one difference, and If a reader can escape from our given world
for the duration of a story, then the story, whether science fiction or
fantasy, has done its job.
Dayvon,
ReplyDeleteI wonder if a slightly more accurate phrasing of what you claim in your first paragraph might be that sf is expansive, whereas fantasy is TRANSGRESSIVE? The idea that fantasy goes beyond could be read as synonymous with "expanding" reality, but that's clearly not what you've specified in the rest of this thoughtful post.
Best,
TT