Science
Fiction or Fantasy? That Is the Question
By
Huajie
Huang
Speculative
fiction, by definition, is weird, yet outsiders are hardly able to delineate
the boundary between science fiction and fantasy. These two distinctly
different subgenres embody different themes and ideals and require different
mindsets to make the correct interpretations. Science fiction epitomizes an
extension into a faraway world in which the laws of physics still hold. On the
other hand, fantasy serves as a reminder of our childhood longing for a hero’s
journey in a fantastical world.
Science fiction preoccupies
the trained reader with the effects of change brought about by scientific
advances currently beyond our reach but theoretically attainable on humans.
Wait. Hold on. Does this remind you of androids, robots, or aliens? If that is
the case, you are on the right track. Even though robot technology and
extraterrestrial travel remain largely scientific frontiers, there is nothing
in the laws of physics that prohibits the existence of androids, robots, and
aliens. In Phillip K. Dick’s Do Androids
Dream of Electric Sheep?, we find ourselves immersed in this
post-apocalyptic world where technology is at such an advanced state that little
separate androids apart from their human overlords save their empathy, or lack
thereof. Then, the question an intelligent reader should ask is not how we get
there in the first place since it is physically possible to start with but how
the existence of the androids, rogue and complacent alike, affect the human
beings and civilization as we know it. Human society has degraded to a state
where they rely on news delivered by an android as well as an artificial mood
organ. This is precisely what distinguishes science fiction from its brethren
according to James Gunn—that science fiction is a branch of literature that
concerns itself with technological changes, and usually involves matters whose
importance is greater than the individual or the community.
Rick Deckard, an
android bounty hunter, is trying to use a laser tube to annihilate the android
that he is pursuing. Source: http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Androids-Dream-1.jpg
In
contrast, fantasy carries a hint of irrationality and requires the casual
reader, that is, me, to simply take the plot on faith. For instance, you will
never understand Johnson’s “26 Monkeys” if you keep looking for a reason why
Aimee’s monkey-bathtub trick works. That will be missing the point in reading
fantasy. The value of reading fantasy stories such as Neverwhere and The Hobbit
is for you to expose yourself to the truth of how human character reaches
beyond our physical world and allows for interactions between wonder, belief,
and that which we all yearn for, nonconformity to reality. This sounds awfully
familiar. Isn’t this just a return to a childlike mode of thinking—immerse in
the fantastical and the incredulous aspects of the hero without rationally
analyzing and killing the gist of the story, so to speak? Yes, indeed. These
are the qualities that distinguish fantasy readers—the ability to suspend disbelief,
the ability to reevaluate internal assumptions, and the ability to dissociate
oneself from the idea that everything has to be allegorical as Le Guin has
pointed out in her “The Critics, The Monsters, and The Fantasists.”
Moreover,
the gist of fantasy stories can be basically captured by the monomyth model as
described by American psychologist Joseph Campbell in his “The Hero’s Journey.”
The story basically runs like this-a hero will be called to a world of adventure,
undergoes multiple ordeals with supernatural aid, and then return with a
renewed self and enhanced positive traits. Sounds like an awful lot like The Wizard of Oz and The Hobbit to me. So let’s analyze The Hobbit in the new light of this monomyth mold. With the help of
Gandalf and the dwarves, Bilbo Baggins, the protagonist, stumble into this
seemingly magical world of elves, ogres, and Wargs. As the quest progresses,
Bilbo relinquishes his Baggins character and acquires leadership skills in
order to meet the challenges of the quest. Eventually, after the slaying of
Smaug and the battle over the treasures, Bilbo returns to his Bag-End home with
a renewed sense of what he can accomplish not only for himself, but for his
friends as well. Now, here is the ordeal you the reader have to undergo as a
hero. Is The Lord of Light science
fiction or fantasy?
Bilbo Baggins is
taking his stab in killing spiders to save his dwarf friends. Source:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/12/22/arts/spiders-video-image/spiders-video-image-articleLarge-v2.jpg
Jack:
ReplyDeleteHmm. Leaving the question of what _Lord of Light_ is in a reader's hands seems almost cruel of you... ;)
Much of what you've written here fits with what I would expect to here -- about the shape and structure of conflict within a story, and the modes used to make conflict happen in it. You use multiple sources from the class well in defining your POV on the question, and have a clear core notion of how the rational and irrational are crucial to what defines sf and f, respectively.
Best,
TT