A
Distinction Built Upon Beliefs
By
Nisa Faheem
The
genres within speculative fiction all propose some sort of “what if?” question
to their readers; it asks them to challenge what they see and know in their own
world and to accept whatever new constructs that the book builds. To read, and
further enjoy, these types of stories, the reader must be able to lend some
belief to the book. Even if the story revolves around very plausible
happenings, the speculative nature of the text requires the reader to accept
the unreal material and the consequences that follow. Thus, all types of
speculative fiction, including science fiction and fantasy, require belief from
their audience in the world that has been built. The distinction between the
two genres really lies in how the book itself deals with belief, especially
that of religion. Science fiction, over many decades, has shown a tendency of using
science to show religion in a negative light, whereas fantasy uses the ideas of
belief/faith to propel a story forward.
Science
Fiction, as according to Farah Mendlesohn's
"Religion and Science Fiction", in the 1920s utilized a sense of
mysticism and belief in the early writings, but as the interest shifted into a
more precise and in depth depiction of science, the use of belief changed. The
religion trope in writing emerged to mock humans’ (or other characters’)
dependence on superstition and belief to justify the world around them, rather than
solely using scientific judgment. This formed the idea that characters that
would use faith as some sort of justification were inferior intellectually and
were seen as different/primitive, a side effect of the “high fantasy world that
heavily relied on the exoticization of ‘the Other’”. The rejection of faith
based reasoning has been seen to be a theme in novels discussed in class. In Roger Zelazny's Lord of Light, the original settlers
establish a religion-system where they can keep order. The logical reasoning to
keep a new colony alive develops over years into an oppressive power against
the humans that worship underneath them. Scientific advancement is limited to
those with power already; meaning those at the bottom cannot do anything for
themselves until they are saved. In this specific example, religion is seen to
be a disabling force that inhibits man from utilizing scientific based
reasoning; those that are subjected to be faithful suffer.
Although
science fiction can adopt some high-fantasy elements involving the plot (hero’s
journey), the fundamental difference between the genres is how fantasy treats
belief without proper reasoning. Philip Martin, in his piece “Fantasy and
Belief", states that “fantasy celebrates the nonrational”, telling us
outright that both readers and the characters engage in the imaginative world
that fantasy authors build without need for proper reasoning. There are several
ways fantasy propels the story forward, focusing perhaps on the discourse
between good and evil or some sort of prophecy that the characters must
fulfill. One of the earliest examples of modern day fantasy, Lord Dunsany’s The King of
Elfland's Daughter, depicts a story in which magic is sought after
repeatedly but there is little reasoning explaining the character’s actions. In
this case, the beauty of the story lies with the imagery rather than the plot,
meaning that the whole story is subject to imaginative world building rather
than reason-based action. More modern examples may have more of a logic-based
plot, but some elements of the story strictly work due to the characters’
belief in them, and further, our belief that it works in the novel. In Neil
Gaiman’s Neverwhere, the
main character originally struggles to believe that there is a world that
exists beyond, or underneath, his own, but as the story progresses he slowly is
able to accept this idea along with all the other irrational happenings in
London Below. The works within fantasy do not have to reject the ideas of
logic, but they certainly do embrace the imagination in ways that science
fiction simply cannot.
Nisa,
ReplyDeleteWhether readers of science fiction AND fantasy can embrace the idea of faith in the same way is a sticky wicket, indeed -- and you've nailed down a strong path of sources from this course that seem to indicate they don't/can't/won't. What I'm wondering, though, is if it's actually up to an author how to approach the idea of belief versus skepticism and try to address them in their text. That seems logical, and just as Cramer's article says, we see authors in sf of different periods adopting trends of attitude on just this issue. Can an author go against this polarity, and craft fantasy that's skeptical of faith, or science fiction that embraces it authentically? I would think so -- but would readers accept that move as part of the genre as they know it?
Best,
TT