The Difference
between Sci-Fi and Fantasy – Like Magic, Do the Precise Details Really Matter?
By
Mason Dearborn
I find myself answering the age-old
question “What really is the difference between fantasy and sci-fi?” quite
often. Any time someone asks me what my
complicatedly-named English class is about (Speculative Fiction Studies), and I
start to explain that we cover both science fiction and fantasy, I know the
question is inevitable. For as often as
I answer it - at the Thanksgiving table, at my grandparents’ house, to my home
friends in Senior Lit. – it is still challenging to give a complete
answer. It is easy to cast a general
categorization and say fantasy has unicorns and sci-fi has robots, but, as can
be seen in your (Ms. Smith’s) question, there are shortcomings to this.
At first glance, aliens seem as fantastical
as dragons. However, the number of people
who believe in aliens is far greater than the number that think there are
dragons, elves, dwarves, and so on exist on Earth. A favorite quotation I rely on when I am
explaining the distinction between the genres, especially to my elderly
grandparents that don’t exactly have the widest imaginations, is by James
Gunn. He defines science fiction as, “a
fantastic event of development considered rationally.” He then concedes, “brevity means lack of
precision” (James Gunn, Toward a
Definition of Science Fiction, pg. 7).
I thank him for acknowledging the failure of his definition to provide
an all-encompassing solution, but his abstract idea is still salvageable. Concurring with Gunn, I believe science
fiction is fantasy with a rational mechanism.
Of course, the opposite is true.
Fantasy is science fiction without the explanation. We don’t need to know how the wardrobe works
in The Chronicles of Narnia; we trust
and believe in the magic of Harry Potter.
Note my use of mechanism. The genre
distinction between fantasy and science fiction is simply a means- a mechanism-
of presenting the true dilemmas, conflicts, and themes of the story. While fantasy may answer more of the “What?”
when compared to sci-fi’s “Why?,” the distinction between the two falls to
approach. Whether it be reached by
stepping through a magic wardrobe, or by a futuristic artificial intelligence
technology, the stories of speculative fiction unfold regardless, each with
their own merits. In Phillip Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, we
DO need to know the mechanics behind the androids to move on to the real
conflicts and dilemmas the story is truly about. The plot of the story is about a human
retiring escaped androids, but the STORY is about the human main character’s growing
confusion about what the difference actually is between himself and the
androids he must kill. The story
explores the human condition, religion, loneliness, and dehumanization. The factors that make DADES? science fiction, rather than fantasy, serve only to set up
the real story.
The genre distinction between
fantasy and science fiction can be relegated to the same level of importance as
the setting. It is still important, but
it facilitates the meat of the story that truly matters. So, Ms. Smith, the difference does NOT matter
(as much). I officially release full
permission to use my ideas over the upcoming holidays. Breeze past the difference between the two
sub-genres and talk more about what’s really important: speculative fiction. Take the Gunn approach and give a vague
answer, using large words of course, and impress your close family. You can now rest easy that no one in your
family will doubt your success and intelligence!
Mason:
ReplyDeleteHa! You've certainly made it sound simple, haven't you? And maybe it is simpler than we give it credit for, this business of defining things.
What you've done particularly well in this post is explain what stories ultimately are: sequences of conflict and distress, things characters face and must overcome. Whether it's a threat armed with talons and fire-breath or ray-guns matters more to our sense of a story's style than its actual conflict itself.
Best,
TT