Unnecessary Distinctions
By
Braden Lauder
Science fiction and fantasy literature have many
things in common, and are usually grouped together in the umbrella genre of
Speculative Fiction. In general, we can visualize a sort of spectrum, with
science fiction on one end and fantasy on the other. If we zoom further in on
this spectrum, we can see the science fiction half divided into hard and soft,
and the fantasy half divided into low and high. Somewhere between soft science
fiction and low fantasy, we’re left with a bit of disputed gray area. In
general, it’s fairly easy to determine whether a story is science fiction or
fantasy and then further classify it as hard, soft, low, or high. As we move
closer towards the center of the spectrum, that distinction becomes harder to
recognize. However, I would argue that the distinction is not one that
necessarily needs to be made. I think
that if you’re going to read a book, you should read that book because you
enjoy it, not because it falls into a certain category of literature. The same
concept can be applied towards education: if there’s some vital lesson to be
extracted from a story, time should be spent discussing that, not debating the genre.
More often than not, this idea does
not even need to be brought into question, because stories tend to gravitate
towards a specific genre. It’s only when we come into contact with one of the
few stories in the middle of our spectrum that we should do away with
discussion over genre and focus on the more important aspects of the text. This is not to say, however, that it would be
impossible to decode the genre of
these middle-spectrum stories. In fact, with enough thought with regards to
both the story in question and the countless pieces on literary theory out
there (shoutout to Martin, Hartwell, Le Guin, Delany, Cramer, and many more!),
you could doubtlessly come to a conclusion sooner or later about the genre of
the story. However, my argument here is that it would be more beneficial to
unpack the story itself and what it represents, rather than do the same for its
genre as a whole.
Usually when we can easily classify
a story by definitively placing it along the spectrum, we can do so because it
was intentionally written in a way that highlights the inherent qualities of
its genre. Conversely, if we come across a story towards the middle, it’s
probably a safe bet to assume that the story is there because the author’s
focus was not genre-specific, but rather set on something more important. For
example, a high fantasy story that delves deep into the creation of a
fantastical setting may not be able to go as deep into character development as
a story set in our established universe might. Without the burden of creating
an entire world, the author is free to use the story to easily discuss
something else, such as maybe providing a unique perspective on human nature or
offering a veiled opinion on a real-world issue through allegorical people and
events. While these things are certainly still possible to do through a story
that is polarized on the spectrum, it is considerably more difficult because so
much effort must first go into establishing the story as a component of its
genre, where as if it is left in the middle, the author can jump right in to
the true meaning of the text.
If we think about the umbrella of
speculative fiction being accurately represented by a spectrum from hard
science fiction all the way to high fantasy, we notice some distinct
differences between those stories that fall on the ends of the spectrum and
those that remain towards the center. Being so familiar with the incredibly
metatextual genre, authors of speculative fiction are very conscious of where
their stories will end up on this spectrum, and we can use that information to
help us determine what is important in the text. Too often, readers get hung up
on decoding the genre, because many people are uncomfortable being unable to
define what they experience. As a result, these stories in the center often
have their points missed because their readers are too busy trying to classify
them. We should spend less time concerning ourselves with genre distinction and
more time worrying about what we may have missed while we were debating whether
a story was science fiction or fantasy.
Braden:
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that pleasure, and not labels, should guide what we read... But I do find myself a little puzzled by this assertion that, for example, a high fantasy story with a detailed world couldn't also have deeply developed characters. I'm reading N.K. Jemisin's _The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms_ now and finding myself really moved by the clarity and depth of her characters, right down to the secondary cast, and it's very much a high fantasy, secondary-world story. It's fair to say it's hard to have your proverbial cake and eat it, too, but art can be quite an expansive thing. It rarely ever reaches its absolute limits.
Best,
TT