Dear Carmen Maria Machado: What Makes Me Pick up a Book
by Eve Adami
So many books, so little time. Luckily, I’m
picky so this isn’t too much of a problem for me. In this post I’ll share with
you how I pick out a book. What makes me like it and what makes me stop reading
it. Although my methods do almost always find me a book I like, I have found
that I love pretty much every book I’ve been forced to read in a class, so…
yea.
Although I agree that you shouldn’t
judge a book by its cover, I do in fact, judge a book by its cover. I’ve found
that a lot of speculative fiction stories have covers with mythical creatures
or stoic looking girls. These do not appeal to me. Before this class I did not
read a lot of speculative fiction because I believed they were solely stories,
or entertainment, and not something you could learn from. Luckily, this class
has proved me wrong and I now know that speculative fiction is just as valid,
if not more so, than any other genre. But I am not fully turned and when I see
a cover that is so purely science fiction or fantasy and action-y I cannot take
the leap. I know that a lot of other people do the same thing. But on the other
hand, those types of covers appeal to a certain audience. I like covers that
are ambiguous. They could be realistic fiction or they could be speculative
fiction. I will almost definitely attempt to read a book if the cover of the
book looks like it could be realistic fiction and then the I read the inside
cover and discover it is speculative fiction. I will also read a book if the
synopsis is confusing. I know this idea may be counter-intuitive, but I can
give some examples. Earlier this year I read a book entitled Challenger Deep by Neil Shusterman. This
was one of the rare books that I picked up to read this year in my free time,
so you know it must have looked very good to me.
The cover looked interesting, but gave me little insight on
what the book was actually about. The synopsis goes on to describe the
character of Caden Bosch as a high school student as well as an artist on ship.
It was short and didn’t help me much on what the book was about, and this made
it much more intriguing.
This
brings me into my least favorite thing an author can do; spend too much time on
world building. If any character is described (their relation to other
characters, who they are, etc.) within the first couple pages, there is a good
chance I will put down the book. In fantasy and science fiction stories may
take place in realities separate from our own, but I do not need the new
reality to be directly explained to me. I prefer decoding the world for myself.
Challenger Deep was a bit confusing
at first, but the lack of world building allowed me to fully see the world from
the main character’s perspective. This ended up adding tremendously to the
story (don’t want to spoil it though). My favorite book, The Underneath by Kathi Appelt is also free of any discrete world
building. It also fits my cover test, with the cover featuring a dog and cat,
while the book is about a cat’s adventure in a magical swamp. The Underneath is written with beautiful
poetic language, and if Appelt attempted to explain the rules of the new world,
this language would have been lost.
As I’m writing this I’m realizing
that truly all of my favorite books follow the criteria mentioned above. Kurt
Vonnegut always jumps right in to his stories, not sparing any words to explain
what exactly is going on. And the resulting spontaneity in books such as Slaughterhouse-Five makes them fun to
read. I think this could be why I have loved the short stories we have read in
class so much. There is no time in short stories for intense world building.
All words are reserved for actual story.
While I understand that not picking
up books that have clear covers or synopses severely limits my options, the
method has found me some of my favorite reads. Perhaps I am a true speculative
fiction reader who is too particular for my own good, but I don’t think I am
going to change my ways anytime soon.
Eve,
ReplyDeleteIt seems like the common denominator (beyond an intriguing cover) for your desire to pick up a novel comes down to how much the language of its synopsis matches the promise of its premise. Balancing not giving too much away with demonstrating something of the prose style seen between the covers is a hard thing to manage, especially when production managers and copywriters at publishers have more to do with what the final product looks like than the author -- or least, more to do with the OUTSIDE of that final product.
The Underneath sounds like a great read! I'm filing that one away for future binging. :)
best,
TT