To Carmen Maria Machado: How to
Make Me Hate Your Book
By Jack Badalamenti
In a nutshell, I’ll quit reading your book if you piss me
off. That really covers it, but since you’ve come all this way, I’ll elucidate.
I recently read a novel called Lord of Light by Roger Zelazny. Zelazny being somewhat of a big
name in the SF world combined with an interesting premise and, yes, an
appealing cover, to catch my attention. Of course, the most compelling reason
for me to read this book was because I was required to for the sake of my
grade, but let’s put that technicality in the phantom zone for now. Zelazny
instantly made me really mad, and for that reason I put down the book in the
middle of page three. Lord of Light
demonstrates one path to alienating the reader: the first few minutes of
reading are nothing but name dropping and references to the story’s world and
specific terms that the reader has no way of understanding. I really did get
the sense that Roger didn’t actually want me to understand his dumb book, so I stopped trying.
For a bit.
Unfortunately
the phantom zone burst open and my GPA put me back to slogging through it. When
I found that the book is actually quite interesting and enjoyable, I honestly
just became even more upset. Here was a perfect good book that wouldn’t get out
of its own way. I would never have read that story all the way through if it
weren’t for extenuating circumstances, which would have been a bummer both for
myself and Mr. Zelazny.
The
only other time I can recall putting down a book, never to return, was when I
attempted Stephen King’s The Stand
at the tender age of 14. I came across
the book at the recommendation of my father, who has lined the shelves in our
living room with The Dark Tower and The Gunslinger, among others. I got into it
and enjoyed the book a great deal. I recommend it and any other Stephen King to
anybody who has the time for it. Seriously, the guy is a genius, albeit a bit
troubled. The best part of his writing is the constant slow build – King pushes
the dial oh-so-slowly towards 11 with every word, careful never to rush or give
anything away. Somewhere near the middle of the novel, I had had enough.
Everything in the story was going poorly for the good guys, and it honestly
looked like everything was going to shit. I decided I was gonna step back and
jump into whatever YA nonsense they were selling us that year. Here again, the
thing that pushed me away was too much of the bad stuff.
You see, readers like reading the good parts of
stories more than the evil or sad parts. Don’t get me wrong, you need some of
both – nobody wants to read something with no conflict. That’s called pushing
your feelings down, and it’s unhealthy. Necessary evil notwithstanding, though,
the only reason I put up with terrible things happening to good people (or at
the very least the characters I like) in stories is because of the payoff of
justice being served, them being rewarded, and everything being Good again. How
this applies to The Stand and other
fiction is that, and I do realize what I’m saying, I don’t want to read stuff
that makes me feel sad. Say what you will about how mature of a reader or
person I am, but at the end of the day, I want my stories to hit the spot in a
positive way more than in a negative way. Nobody wants the bad guy to win, and
nobody wants the heroes to not be heroic. That last bit is what almost ruined
my viewing of The Dark Knight Rises.
I mean honestly, who the hell wants to see Bruce Wayne dangling around like a
rag doll in a hole for half of a film? Nobody, that’s who. And nobody wants to
see evil rule the world. And nobody wants to see the good guys lose. And so on.
Long story short, just make sure your fiction feels
good and doesn’t make me hate you.
Dear Jack,
ReplyDeleteHuh. Well, tell us what you really feel, huh? Don't hold back or anything!
In all seriousness, you raise a valid point about the importance of balance in a narrative. Yes, abeyance and immersive world-building are important in sf, but there's a difference between being immersed up to your chest and being dunk-tanked in the first chapter. Some readers may want that kind of stark treatment, but many more are probably like you, wanting to ease into the world and get fed its nuances in chewable bites.
And yes, conflict and even suffering is a driver of story, but the reader needs some sense of payoff, too. Not everything can be futile and destroyed, not everything grimdark. The comics industry tried that in the 1990s and it almost didn't recover.
As for hating the author? Hmm. That seems a mite more complicated than just whether you can get into the book, right? At least, I hope it would be. That way lies the darkness of 4chan subforums and stanning.
Best,
TT