Dear Carmen Machado: We Read Fantasy Like
Children, Not Adults
By Ian Lesnik
When
you're deciding what to read, outside of school, what compels you to pick up a
particular book? And once you've started, what's the worst thing an author can
do? What makes you decide not to finish something?
Much like children, it’s fairly
difficult to get the attention of a reader, and much more difficult to keep it
for the hours that it takes to read an entire book. Considering the sheer
number of fictional stories someone could pick up, the only thing a book is to
me before I begin reading is a title and perhaps the brief introduction on its
covers or some website. Recommendations can also influence what I read, but
those often consist mainly of already immensely popular books, and people such
as myself don’t have the time to read far past these lists. I’m afraid I don’t
have much more than that regarding what compels me to read a book other than
that it aligns with my interests, but there are a few things that would result
in me casting a book aside indefinitely.
Something I
constantly see authors fail to do is try to tell two stories simultaneously. The
method for doing this that I’m more familiar with is through a series of books
where each one focuses on a specific character and then later books bring them
together. One of my favorite series, The
Age Of Fire by E. E. Knight, attempts to do this, however when reading
through the novels I felt that the transition between the first and second
books, Champion and Avenger, was inadequate. Not only does
the second book suffer from the reader wanting to return to the character
they’re already invested in from the first book, AuRon, but the writing style
and story that unfolds is so different that it almost feels like each book is
intended for a different audience. This results in some people who enjoyed the
first book stopping during the second because of this unexpected change. If the
reader wanted a story that involved such a starkly different topic they would
begin with another series instead of continuing. Rather than completely
dropping the series, I decided to move on to the third book, Outcast, that yet again involved a
different main character. However, the story returned to the same pace and type
of story that was set in Champion
with similarities between the struggles the characters face with AuRon having
no scales for protection and Outcast’s
RuGaard having a crippled arm and initially no name. Although Outcast still pulled the reader away
from Champion, the similarities
between the characters, writing, and events allowed Outcast to still be enjoyable for me. The other method for telling
two stories simultaneously is switching between characters after each chapter.
However, this is just as excruciating as the first method for me because once I
begin to feel attached to one character I’ll begin to dread chapters involving
the other character, even to the point of skipping them.
Another
thing authors have done that hinders my ability to enjoy their book involves
telling me too many things that, in the grand scheme of the book or series, do
not matter. This was something I also felt during E. E. Knight’s Avenger and contributed to my decision
to skip the second half of the book. This became apparent to me as I read the
final three books in the series, Strike,
Rule, and Fate. Of course I did
not know one or two characters, but their roles in the over-arching story were
minor and I hadn’t felt like I had missed very much. I’ve also heard similar
things about J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Two Towers from friends and online sources
alike to skim the book instead of read it for enjoyment due to Tolkien’s
detailed writing while very little happens. This obstacle has pushed me toward
other books rather than finishing the series.
Because
people primarily read fantasy for pleasure, pulling them away from characters
they already know in an attempt to introduce another only impedes the reader
from experiencing the story they want to. Likewise, excessive time spent away
from these characters in descriptions or meaningless events feels more like
empty space within the actual story and reduces how much the reader can enjoy.
Introducing either of these things can result in a reader finding another book
that they can derive more happiness from, similar to how children will tend to
choose benefit now rather than more benefit later.
Dear Ian,
ReplyDeleteAs someone who prefers to write in close third person with a large cast of characters to shift POVs among, hearing that readers like you bail on books that don't give you the same characters consistently IS a mite sobering.
But I think you're talking about something quite different from actually shifting POVs within a story, more wholesale shifting focus in the course of a series. Of course authors might choose to do this as they play out certain plotlines to their conclusions or tire of working certain characters, wanting to give them (and themselves) a break. But it's important to look at things from the reader perspective, too, and reward their focus on particular characters however we can.
best,
TT