An Author’s
Responsibility is a Reader’s Choice
By Yugan Sakthi
Often
times stories that other people—my friends, classmates, teachers, my aunt—adore
are ones I can barely stomach, much less read all the way through. In grade
school, for example, many of my friends kept telling me that the Hardy Boys series was the best they had
ever read, but I became bored of it fast.
To
answer the first part of Maria Carmen Machado’s question – what makes you pick up a book? I turn to my reading of fiction as
early as I can remember. Apart from being read to by my parents, the first
series I read of my own volition was Magic
Tree House by Mary Pope Osborne. Starting with Dinosaurs Before Dark, I worked my way through their enthralling
(at the time) adventures through time. To me, the captivating factor in these
books was the sense of wonder and imagination I could get from reading them.
They weren’t just books I read. They
were books I thought about.
In
school, I’d stare outside the window at the woods in our yard, wondering if one
day a treehouse would appear there to whisk my away into the lands of Avalon,
or 1940s Brooklyn, or the prehistoric ages. I hoped that I could just say a few
words and the mundane everyday life of homework and afterschool piano lessons would
change into a better world, one with magic and samurai and knights.
It’s
not a new idea; J.R.R. Tolkien mentions the three elements of fantasy as
escape, recovery, and consolation. And in a way, Magic Tree House was all three to me.
Using
Magic Tree House as a springboard, I
dived into reading other stories. I found books in one of two ways: the first
would be by its cover (you heard me right. If I thought the cover looked
interesting, I’d read it), and the second was by recommendation, either by my friends,
teachers, librarians, or anyone else.
And
to this day, those two remain the two primary ways I start reading a book:
either by recommendation, or by its cover (and, of course, the back-cover
synopsis). I have never been one to care about reviews, whether they be online
or in magazines. Reading about reading was never my style, so my selection in
books still is about gut feeling, and that’s it.
Once
I pick up the book, though, it’s a very different story. I rarely, if ever,
don’t finish a book, even if it is like chewing through a wet towel. That
aforementioned idea of capturing not just my attention, but also my thinking,
is my answer to the second part of Machado’s question: what’s the worst mistake an author could do? If the book I’m
reading doesn’t make me think about it intensely outside of reading it, then to
me the author has committed the equivalent of literary homicide.
And
that doesn’t mean the story needs to have intricate subplots or puzzling story
structure. A simple narration of events is sometimes my favorite story, if the
underlying themes and messages are truly impactful. George Orwell’s 1984 is a prime example of this.
Although quite well-written, the book itself is pretty straightforward, and
narrates through the eyes of Winston Smith a story of thought control,
“socialism,” and love.
Yet
it is a book that I still think about to this day, a year and a half after
reading it. The implications that book had on society—the dire consequences it
foretold of increasing government power—were enormous, and I could spend days
thinking about how those consequences might play out in our own society.
On
the other hand is the novel The Fault in
our Stars by John Green, widely acclaimed to be a gripping tale of love and
death, yet which to me was little more than well-written story that made me
smile or frown every 50 or so pages. To me, there wasn’t much to think about,
and even though Green was a powerful writer, his story just didn’t seem to have
an impact on me.
But
in the end, I’m a fan of most books that I read. As bad as one may be, I always
make sure to finish, if for nothing but to learn for myself what kinds of books
I don’t like. As I keep hunting for more material to read, I know I’ll broaden
my horizons and be a little better at choosing—and judging—stories.
Yugan,
ReplyDeleteYou raise a good point in your final paragraph about how the act of reading new stories makes one better at choosing and judging others. I imagine if you were to look back at your reading experiences, you'd see that effect in process from the beginning. Perhaps that's part of the reason that, problematic as his claims broadly are, I do agree with Hartwell's belief that the "golden age" of sf is twelve - starting young isn't the only way, but tapping into that sense of wonder and developing it young is important to building a reader's ability to cope with ambiguity and complexity (if not of narrative, than of the questions the text implicitly or explicitly asks). Thanks for sharing your thinking with Carmen Maria!
Best,
TT