To Mr. Gladstone: A Sexy
Narrative Needs a Sexy World
By William Tong
The
first time I picked up The Lord of the Rings, I was pretty hyped. Fresh
from my adventures There and Back Again and surfing the waves of a fantasy
high, I plopped down on my special reading couch, savored the cover material
with solemn delicacy, and proceeded to read. Before long, I was deeply, wildly,
overwhelmingly! -- asleep.
No
offense to Tolkien, of course. He’s a whiz with invented languages, built a
beautiful world, revolutionized modern fantasy, etc., etc., but to be
absolutely honest, no reader could possibly stomach pages upon pages about Hobbit
marijuana, even if Tobold Hornblower of the Southfarthing’s Longbottom family
really did grow the first true pipe-weed in the days of Isengrim the Second.
Don’t get me wrong--the details where great and everything--but sometimes, I’d
be hurting for a little Gandalf-sorcery-magic-awesomeness before getting
slammed with a short novel’s worth of talking heads and background minutiae. To
be fair, it was a pleasant read and tickled my geek-bones. But in the end, it
took me somewhere in the ball park of seven or eight tries before finally, like
Sam and Frodo wrestling the One Ring up the last few steps of Mount Doom, I
(almost) finished! -- needing only a well-timed bite from Gollum (in this case,
a Speech Team coach) to bring the darn thing home.
So I suppose,
in summary, I liked The Lord of the Rings. I just didn’t like reading
it.
Ironic
as that sounds, when I think back on LotR, The Hobbit, and
(especially) The Silmarillion, I don’t remember how mind-numbing the
books could be. What I do remember is the allure of the setting, the intrinsic magic
of the world. At the end of the day, the specifics of the prose and choices
in pacing don’t matter nearly as much as the peace of the Shire, terror of
Mordor, fading richness of Lothlórien, and revitalized glory of Gondor. Reading
the Lord of the Rings, in that sense, not only provided a surefire cure
to the hardiest strains of insomnia, but also offered a chance to trek across a
world at once recognizable yet perhaps infinitely more wondrous than my own.
So to
answer the question, the single most important feature of any narrative that
makes it “kinky” for me is the quality of the world. A story could have a
breathtaking plot, perfect pacing, prose so clean you can eat off it, but
unless it’s got a setting and premise to match, it slips through my mind like
sand through a sieve.
To draw
examples from class readings, consider the perennial SF favorites Do
Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and Lord of Light.
For me, reading Dick’s novel was a thrill
ride. There was fighting. There was killing. There was trickery. Heck, there
was even taboo sex with a manufactured lady. I finished DADES? in just a
couple breathless sittings, enjoying surges of adrenaline from the comfort of
the sofa.
Zelazny’s
story, on the other hand, took a far more mellow route. He took his time,
meandering around the world, exploring the intricacies of the politics, taking
care to convey a measure of culture, stripping away enough of the religion to
reveal tantalizing glimpses of the technological machinery whirring underneath.
In short, he developed a vibrant world replete with neat mechanics, complicated
relationships, and--most importantly--the illusion of depth and the sense that
it could really exist in some far off, magical dimension. While reading Lord
of Light was not nearly as edge-of-seat gripping as Androids,
thinking back months later on the two stories, it’s Great-Souled Sam wandering
beneath the Bridge of the Gods I remember and ultimately enjoy more, much more
than Deckard and his guns.
Ultimately,
I read stories to escape Bolingbrook, Illinois for a little while and adventure
across Middle Earth, the surface of another planet, or someplace wilder, more
magical still. I don’t really need the action-packed plots or heart-thrumming
story-lines (that’s what Netflix is for). What I do need is a rich, deep,
engaging world--and that’s something I can find only in a sexy narrative.
Dear William,
ReplyDeleteGah, you're from Bolingbrook?? *waves furiously from one of the subdivisions on Rodeo* That's where I am! How foolish of me never to have noticed that in my instructor reports.
Ahem. Now, back to business, if I may. Putting aside your own compelling prose (I'm going to have to steal "prose so clean you could eat off it" for something), you make an excellent point that there's real value to the "afterglow" of setting and world, particularly in sf. Stories vary widely in their pace and content (Hero's Journey gestures aside) but really engaging secondary worlds (or modified first worlds) are hard to come by, especially in a genre that so easily defaults to western medieval trappings or military space-faring modeled after the American navy. Even if the narrative itself wasn't always as rewarding as we would have wished, we hold the gestalt of a world in our minds and, for love of it, can forgive a lot that makes a read seem at first "less" than another. I, too, have deep respect for Tolkien, but little love for actually reading him. I didn't even crack LoTR until I was in my twenties, because I was dubious about how my attention span would square with it. It turns out, I was right to have been concerned, for the same reasons you report. Thanks for sharing your thinking with Max!
Best,
TT