Everything (A
Response to Chuck Wendig)
By Alex Gong
Solipsism is the theory that oneself is all that can be
known to exist.
Just like how the humans realized their “revived” loved ones
were merely Martian pretenders in “The Third Expedition” of The Martian Chronicles, I cannot know if
I am the only intelligent life and everyone else is merely highly advanced
robots.
It is easy to subscribe to this theory when looking at the
world full of atrocities such as murder, rape, and war. I can merely disconnect
myself from their wrongdoings by saying that they’re not human and that I would not ever do something like that.
Alternatively, I can subscribe to this theory and feel a lot better about
myself when I look at the Ivy League students and Olympic medalists; I can say
“nope” they’re just robots.
Even though there are benefits to believing in solipsism,
most of us would not subscribe to the theory based on the connections we have
made with other humans. Though we may scoff at solipsism, a little part of us
is afraid that it might be true- that the only people we are only like is
ourselves and that we are truly and utterly alone.
However, fiction, as a whole, creates a strong argument
against this theory. How can robots have the same fears and interests as me?
How can they create a piece of work that speaks to me so well? Maybe the robots
are just that advanced.
Solipsism is an interesting yet scary theory for we have no
idea if it’s fact for fiction. What it can tell us is that what scares and
intrigues people at the same time is the unknowable. Nothing we know is truly
certain. Thus, everything is scary yet intriguing. The wide range of what is
available to us in fiction from broken families to coming of age love
stories to alien
intelligence stories to magical
monkey stories confirms that as humans, we’re pretty much
simultaneously intrigued and terrified by everything. As a human being, I can
confirm this. I’m scared of things like the future and new people but at the
same time I’m intrigued by them.
As a result, writers write fiction and readers read fiction.
Writers write fiction in the hopes that someone out there can relate and feel
the same way about life as they do. Writers write fiction to introduce and
expand upon new realities. They write their fiction to relate to others on an
emotional level. Fiction is not only a form of entertainment; it’s also a
connection.
According to Philip Martin in “Fantasy and Belief” in the
genre of fantasy, we explore these fears and interests through imaginative
worlds, “wand-waving magicians, talking animals and other odd creatures never
seen before”. We create worlds of science fictions through “some extrapolated
aspect of actual laws of the universe we live in” such as “spaces stations,
Mars exploration, supercomputers, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering,
robotics.” It speaks great volumes to the creativity and great knowledge of
humans that things which “were vaguely plausible, if far-fetched at the
time…[have] come true”. Even though fantasy and science fiction have their
differences, for science fiction is much more rational than fantasy, they both
explore the dreams, beliefs and values of humans. Through our fears, feelings,
and interests, we are able to relate to other human beings.
I believe what makes fiction and art as a whole so amazing
is that even though we all have different tastes and prefer different styles,
there is always going to be something out there that speaks to our soul. And
that’s pretty mind blowing.
Alex,
ReplyDeleteI love the idea of sff being a kind of response to solipsism -- a way to keep asking tough questions and forcing ourselves to confront the reality of what's around us, and of what we can't really know for certain. In fact, it seems that solipsism is both the thing worth being fascinated by and frightened of. It's the core of so much of what can go wrong between people, don't you think?
Best,
TT