Classic Korean Pop Music
by
Johnathan Guo
If
you have ever seen a Korean Pop (KPOP) music video, you are probably aware that
dance plays a large part in the video.
In the past couple of years, Korean acts such as Miss A,
EXO,
and Girls’
Generation have risen in popularity. Even if you’re not a fan of KPOP like me,
take a quick glance at a video on Youtube and you’ll notice right away that Korean
singers have mastered singing and dancing at the same time.
If
you’re a fan like me, you’ve probably wondered to yourself at some point why
KPOP is so appealing. If you haven’t
before, take a moment to think about it.
Could it be the stunning voices,
the intense
choreography, or even the quirky
costuming. Personally, I think it’s a combination of all
three. These elements have become integral
to the overall appearance of a KPOP video.
Just how these elements create a video, science fiction and fantasy
(SFF) novels are composed of a variety of elements: plot, theme, characters, setting,
etc. If you’ve ever read a SFF novel,
you’ve probably identified common stereotypes.
Think of it like this: dance is
to KPOP as robots are to science fiction. It’s not necessary but it makes a
book more memorable.
The first time I watched Red Velvet’s
Dumb Dumb music
video, the entire video was a blur. To be completely honest, I couldn’t even differentiate
between the group’s five members. I
watched it again… and again… and again and I noticed something. The more times I watched it, the more I
noticed the individual elements. When we
were reading Ray Bradbury’s The Martian
Chronicles, I was pleased with how many stereotypes I could identify
throughout the story. Gwyneth Jones
identified many of these stereotypes in her theory reading, “The
icons of science fiction”.
While
I don’t believe Bradbury overemphasized one element more than another, the
presence of each individual element (rockets, spaceships, robots, aliens, etc.)
created the overall “video” I sought. I
don’t think that these “classic” elements are necessary in a work of science
fiction, but I do believe that they definitely help introduce the genre to a
wider audience, since people will be able to easily identify these classic
elements.
Let’s
take a look at Neil Gaiman’s Stardust.
Stardust boasts all of the conventional character and plot archetypes
you would expect in a work of fantasy.
There’s the lovelorn hero, the damsel in distress, and the villainous
witch. Add a magical setting mixed with
medieval elements and you’ve got yourself an easily identifiable fantasy
novel. Unlike The Martian Chronicles, the readability of Stardust relies heavily upon the presence of these classic
elements. These fantastical elements
have been masterfully blended and work cohesively. If it weren’t for the occasional sex scene, I
think that the inclusion of these classic elements would make it easier for a
younger audience to read.
I
realize the purpose of writing science fiction and fantasy isn’t to make it
easier for us as the readers, but to be honest, I quite like easier reading. As
my peers and I become preoccupied by our academic workloads and extracurricular
activities, we
rarely take the time to read for pleasure (I
realize I’m not in college, but it still applies). I can’t speak for every young reader, but I
do know that the familiarity of the classic elements in a novel appeals to me
because they take me less effort to comprehend. I’m not saying I don’t enjoy
being challenged by what I read, but when being busy really cuts down on my
desire to seek out challenging, unconventional SFF. The classic elements of
science fiction and fantasy make them unique compared to other genres of
literature just like how KPOP is unique in the music scene. Both have their own audiences, which I
believe is in part aided by their “classic” elements. I won’t shy away from a
challenging book or a strange KPOP video, but being similar to what I’m used to
definitely helps attract my interest.
Johnathan,
ReplyDeleteI was excited and surprised to see you bring up Jones' essay on the icons of sf, and a little disappointed to see you not really use it beyond mentioning that it... mentions things? How does the consistency in sff -- sufficient that you really can write a critical article on its iconic elements -- both belie its inventiveness and make that same inventiveness possible? You seem to be nibbling at the edges of this when you talk about how a familiarity with "classic" elements in anything (KPOP, genre fiction, what have you) can allow you to approach a work.
Best,
TT