Dear Bridget Smith:
Spice Things Up and Mix ‘Em Around!
By
Katherine Su
I have a passion for cooking but an
aversion to following recipes. I find that some of the most delicious dishes
use eclectic ingredients: For example, instant ramen combined with peanut
butter creates an effortless yet satisfying Pad Thai, mangoes dusted with chili
powder have just the right kick, and a dash of vinegar makes chocolate cake
heavenly. My habits in the kitchen have led me to discover that most things are
more interesting, fun, and exciting when they’re unconventional!
50 pages into Suzanne Collins’s The
Hunger Games, you know what’s going to happen: [SPOILER ALERT… I guess]
First, Katniss will be selected as a tribute. Then, she’ll fight in The Games,
become champion, and ultimately lead a successful revolution against the
Capitol. (Easy peasy! No surprises here.) We see this predictability in many
other series, like Harry Potter, The Twilight Saga, and The
Chronicles of Narnia. As it seems, many authors use tropes like dystopian
societies, autocratic governments, sexy vampires, and wizards. However, the
fact that they accept these themes as previous literature has defined them
means that we, as readers, can expect typical storylines like courageous coup
d’états, star-crossed vampire-human relationships, and warfare between good and
evil magic. Thus, the acceptance of tropes for what they have been (rather than
what they could be) results in predictable plotlines and makes for some pretty
uninteresting reading.
A few months ago, however, some of my
classmates showed me that recurring themes and character types aren’t
necessarily a bad thing. They pointed out that deviating from or mixing up
existing literary archetypes (i.e. The Monomyth) can actually give a story more depth. For example,
the absence of “The Refusal of the Call” in Diana Wynne Jones’s Howl’s
Moving Castle demonstrates that our hero, Sophie, transforms not only
physically, but also mentally. By accepting her curse, she demonstrates her
newfound strength and belief in her personal will and power.
In addition, in science fiction,
unconventional or divergent representations of common archetypes (like aliens
and robots) can effectively elicit different responses from the reader. For
example, the intangibleness of the aliens in Robert Silverberg’s “Passengers,”creates a strong sense of unpredictability and an
even greater fear of the unknown. The aliens in “Passengers” are quite
different from the ones found in stories like Paul Cornell’s “Find a Way Home” and Terry Bisson’s “They’re Made Out of Meat,” who demonstrate a very visible power and thus evoke
feelings of immediacy and realization. In Ray Bradbury’s The Martian
Chronicles, the similarities between the alien race and humanity create a
strange and unsettling familiarity. Each of these works showcases a different
type of alien, and, by this method, is able to evoke a different reaction from
its audience.
I do believe that there are some “classic
elements” of science fiction and fantasy that are beneficial in and of
themselves. For example, Philip Martin’s ideas of Recovery, Escape, and
Consolation (which he discusses in his work Fantasy and Belief), are
essential to fantasy stories. Without these aspects, a story would fail to
transport its readers to another world, to liberate childish wonder, and to
expose its audience to new perspectives. Without, Recovery, Escape, and
Consolation, fantasy (if we would still call it that) would not be able to do
its job and would ultimately be much less enjoyable to read. In addition, some
science fiction conventions, like Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics and
Clarke’s Three Laws, allow writers to create worlds that are logical, consistent,
and structurally sound. Asimov’s and Clarke’s laws give science fictional
worlds the ability to function, and thus play a valuable role in the genre of
science fiction.
So, yes, there are some classic elements of SFF that are valuable. However, in order to produce something truly interesting, writers must not be afraid to deviate from the norm! By spicing things up, mixing things around, and adding in the unexpected, SFF authors will be able to create more powerful, exciting, and compelling stories.
Katherine,
ReplyDeleteYour metaphor of taking recipes to unexpected places with unconventional ingredients works well for this blog post about bending expectations in fiction. I'm glad, too, that you acknowledge some kinds of genre fiction really do rely on a core (emotional or narrative in nature) that is close to a constant. They're a bit like tentpoles, these tropes or conventions. They can help hold up a structure, but the structure itself is largely comprised of everything AROUND them.
Best,
TT