Hero with a
Thousand Faces
By Gene Kim
Dear Michi Trota:
Ms. Townsend provides a substantial
amount of stories for the geeks in Speculative Fiction Studies. Of all the
stories I most thoroughly enjoyed The Last
Unicorn by Peter Beagle. Was it
because of Schmendrick’s slap stick humor? Was it because the villain, King Haggard, manic
behavior to collect unicorns? Or was it
because Peter Beagle masterfully balances humor and serious themes? I enjoyed this story for its amazing balance
of humor and literary elements. Peter
Beagle uses his humor to make the reader reflect. However after the punch line, the reader
feels more sympathetic toward the characters.
Schmendrick is an immortal wizard
searching for a way to improve his magic.
Schmendrick’s teacher describes his student, “My son, your ineptitude so vast, your incompetence so
profound, that I am certain you are inhabited by greater power” (Beagle
150). This line alone, connects to every
student who feels incompetent, but believes they can be successful. The Last
Unicorn also causes me to reflect on the character’s weaknesses. However, it does end happier. Schmendrick achieves his goal of becoming a
more magical wizard, and he finds happiness with Molly, and “he laid his arms
softly around Molly’s shoulders” (Beagle 291).
Even with more magic, he finds a new happiness with the people and
events around him.
Although not all genre stories are as
entertaining or reflective. I believe
this shows in some of the most famous stories that apply for Hugo and Nebula
awards as well. I remember reading your
post on Hugo award nominations. At least in class, I attribute the similarities
in stories to some of the Gernsback ghetto. During class we analyzed how fantasy stories
follow the monomyth, and the sad part is that bothers me. It seems like every character is the same
when they copy the monomyth. There is no
development, and so writers have not truly escaped the Gernsback ghetto. As a result, I feel no need to reflect. I can connect more when human protagonists
are given an opportunity to succeed and repair their failures.
I want more books like Super Toys Last All Summer Long by Brian
Aldiss, since it focuses on human folly rather than robot failure. The short story highlights the relationship
between a mother and her cyborg son. The
argument is that the story is about the mother’s failure as a human to love her
adopted child. She does not know why she
cannot connect with her son. The story
“Super-Toys Last All Summer Long,” she gets an answer from her son’s robotic
teddy bear. She
asks “Why can’t we communicate?”
In this case, there was no
solution. This story shows a human
inadequacy rather than a machine error.
When stories choose to have the protagonist fail, it makes me realize
human folly, and it warns me to change.
Not every ending is pleasant, and it serves as a reminder in speculative
fiction. Although successful heroes are
interesting too. I feel the monomyth
acts as a crutch for some stories, and causes the stories to seem repetitive.
So what works for everyone? The truth is, there is no general answer. I find that genre stories that have themes of
loss or human failure the most appealing because it reveals the inner most
fears of humans: the truth. Themes that
reveal to other people that humans are supposed to mess it up. It breaks the ideal victory that people see,
since life is not about that.
For me, I wanted a story that shows how
the hero deals with failure. That is one
reason why I enjoy science fiction so much since it analyzes the consequences
of a new idea. Stories with a human
centered problem are the ones that cause me to reflect most, whether I’m
thinking about it in the library or with friends. Going back to The Last Unicorn, I have to attribute my enjoyment to the group
discussions since we compared the motives of different characters. While Schmendrick wanted to improve, I felt
he was selfish. My group thought
otherwise. We never agreed, but I loved
analyzing a character as strange as the book, and I hope to find more stories
that alter the monomyth structure.
Gene,
ReplyDeleteHmm. I wonder if it's as mutually exclusive as (some parts of) your post makes it seem, the use of the Monomyth and the ability to transcend that same core myth? After all, for the hero to complete any version of the Hero's Journey, they must face failure -- and they don't necessarily overcome that failure in the usual sense. And if Schmendrick is selfish, well... aren't we all? I don't know that being selfish and being heroic can't coexist in the same person. It may be that's a distinction that doesn't actually create difference.
Best,
TT