Dear Bridget Smith: Important Elements in
Fantasy
By
Naima Muckom
One element of fantasy that I enjoy is Jason Cambell’s
explanation of The Hero’s Journey, also known as the Monomyth, the typical
formula for a fantasy story which authors can use to write their books. The Monomyth is a cycle that consists of
three main stages: Separation, Initiation, and Return. Most books follow this cycle and one benefit
of books following this cycle is that it helps me as the reader to feel
comfortable because I know what will happen in the book.
However, after a while of reading fantasy book that
follow the Monomyth, it can become a bit boring. I still enjoy reading those types of books
and just because a book follows the cycle doesn’t mean I won’t read it. In fact, some of my favorite books, such as
the Harry Potter series, and the Percy Jackson and the Olympians series follow
the Monomyth. But, I do appreciate books
that differ from the stages of the Monomyth once in a while. After reading several books that follow the Monomyth,
a book that doesn’t follow it can be refreshing and more interesting. For example, one specific stage of the Monomyth
is the “Belly of the Whale” in which the hero leaves their current world to
enter another. Instead of having the
hero stay in the unknown world throughout the entire story, I think it would be
interesting if they switched between the worlds. If a book has variations of the stages of
the Monomyth, it would stand out to me among other books because I wouldn’t be
getting what I anticipated of the story.
J.R.R. Tolkien’s books
had three stages that readers went through: Recovery, Escape, and
Consolation. Most fantasy books, if not
all of them, are also written in a way that makes readers go through these
stages. Because I’m a huge fan of
fantasy and use it as a way of escaping the real world, I greatly value this
element of fantasy. The Recovery stage
helps me get immersed into the story and back into fantasy. The Escape allows me to hide away in a fantasy
world and escape the real world and its troubles. And finally, Consolation helps me feel
positive and energized after finishing the book. I find this element of fantasy extremely
valuable and it is one of the main elements that I look for in a good book.
Another element of
fantasy is archetypes. I read A Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. Le
Guin and it surprised me because of the archetypes it broke which made it
unique. A story that follows too many
archetypes becomes too predictable and boring.
Yes, Le Guin’s book was the one of the first books about wizards and
wizard schools to exist, but I had grown up reading more recently written books
and “popular” books. Because of this, I
had certain expectations of a book about magic due to the archetypes set by the
books I had grown up reading. For
example, I was surprised that the main character, Ged, tried to use as little
magic as possible. I wasn’t used to this
idea since most characters with magic use their powers whenever useful to
them. Also, Le Guin chose to have Ged
travel unaccompanied on his journey.
There also wasn’t a set series of goals he had to reach which lead him
to his final challenge. For a majority
of the book, Ged is just traveling with no specific goal. This made the story more interesting because
I anticipated one thing but something else actually happened. In my opinion, this bait and switch idea caused
by breaking the archetypes makes the story better. I do believe however, that not all the
archetypes should be broken. If too many
archetypes are broken, I start to dislike the book because nothing is expected
and I like being able to predict what will happen in a story to a certain
extent. Archetypes serve to make a story
more organized and it’s similar to “shorthand” writing for readers so that
readers can more immediately be immersed into the story.
Because of this, I find
that a book should try to vary a little in the Monomyth and should break
archetypes once in a while. However, I
think the strongest element of fantasy that authors should try to incorporate is
the three stages the readers go through when reading a story.
Naima,
ReplyDeleteThanks for really clearly spelling out the classical narrative elements you appreciate in sff-nal works. It's interesting how much we both hunger for and rely on these familiar attributes, and how much we also enjoy seeing them subverted or altered for an author's specific purposes. In a lot of ways, that ability to innovate off of a known model is really at the center of story-telling, as an enterprise.
Best,
TT