Dear Elsa Sjunneson-Henry: Hello My Name Is Rémy Sua
by AJ Federici
by AJ Federici
I’ll
be honest; I had to click on the hyperlink that was provided to learn what a
Mary Sue is. Aside from all of the Star
Trek references that went over my head (sorry to all you die-hard fans), what I
took away was that a Mary Sue can be one of two things if not both: a self-Insert
or a character so ideal and interesting to the point that the story is vapid
and unoriginal. I’m under the impression
that welcoming writers to reflect their own marginalization’s into their work
is more of the first Mary Sue and we are less concerned at pushing back at the
decrying remarks about "Lt. Mary Sue [who] ran the ship, and ran it so well she
received the Nobel Peace Prize”.
With
those clarifications out of the way, I say that we, the speculative fiction
community, should be accepting and not critical towards the author avatar style
Mary Sue. An example of a story that
seemed to have a character blatantly similar to the author from what I
understand is Nisi Shawl’s “The Mighty Phin”. I was very befuddled about what the heck was going on
over the course of this short story, but what I can tell you is that Nisi’s
story is about a person of color, suffering from a type of physical disability,
that may or may not be married to a transgender partner. Oh yeah, and the whole story takes place in a
prison. Frankly, I don’t relate to any
of these characterizations yet I whole-heartedly enjoyed reading “The Mighty
Phin” because it explored the theme of what makes a human in a similar way to Philip
Dick’s DADES?. The cyberpunk world drew me in, and if the
specific abnormalities of the characters help certain groups feel represented
then I say it’s a great thing for the sf community.
That
said, I think there is also value in avoiding this trope in character writing. Very important things can be said for putting
your own adversity into a story, especially if your story is one that hasn’t
been told adequately, as seems to be the prompting for the Disabled People
Destroy Science Fiction edition of Uncanny Magazine. As well as, you know, who doesn’t want to
literally be a character in a book. But,
why I say that maybe it isn’t always best to have a direct self-insert is that I
think it takes even more skill to demonstrate the struggles, mentality, and
over all essence of self in a sort of counter-character. That is, finding new
ways to portray what you have in mind without directly inserting yourself and
falling into the label of being a Mary Sue writer. And yes, it may be boring to make your
character relatable by creating an internal issue of perhaps a poor family life
or a struggle with bullying. Anyone could have gone through this while for you,
being a bold and outspoken deaf blind writer might feel more at home and you’re
tired of only relating to people by feelings that have been written about time
and time again
Yet,
I still want to somewhat push back on this because if a character can tell a
witty joke that has me laughing, that’s enough for me to really feel a
connection through a mutual sense of humor.
It’s not that I personally would be fed up with a book because it isn’t
about me or because I can’t relate in that I haven’t dealt with many struggles
other people have, but it’s that I think subtle character development is really
masterful writing. “From Sucks (to be you)” by Katharine Duckett,
right out of the new Uncanny Magazine Issue, the very first sentence I think
captures what I’m trying to say:
“Call me
lamia, call me lilith, call me nightmare, slattern, slut. I don’t subscribe to
labels.”
Right
off the bat it seems like this main character is going to have something to say. Although no literary expert I got subtle
hints of a pushback on slut-shaming culture that is somewhat prevalent amongst
teens. Yet, it’s the no-hesitation-spunk
that I enjoy and allows me to feel a connection to the character in Katharine
Duckkett’s piece. My overall advice to
any author would be to own your work and not hesitate to write about an oddly
specific character; however, it may also be a fun and rewarding challenge to
attempt to get the same messages across utilizing a more “boring” character.
AJ,
ReplyDeleteI'm a fan of the idea that the thing a character needs to be worth our time is "having something to say," especially because that changes our assumptions about: a.) what's left to be said; b.) who gets to do the speaking. Both of those points speak to Elsa's question about Mary Sues and exploring oneself through writing in an important way, and I think that's at the core of your response. After all, we invest in characters (as writers) whose stories we want to tell, and there's nothing wrong with some part of that story ALSO being your own.
Best,
TT