Dear Vina Jie-Min Prasad: Continuity, Accuracy, Suspense
By Matthew Feinberg
Endings, to me, are the most important part of a story.
If the ending is trash, unfulfilling, a letdown, or just simply bad,
then I feel that the lead up to the ending is wasted. The beginning and middle
should mainly serve as building blocks for the end of the story, to help push
the plot into an exciting, suspenseful ending. To me, there are three main
qualities of a good ending: continuity, accuracy, and suspense. One of my
favorite books, The Martian, does an amazing job with all three
categories.
Continuity is one of the least obvious qualities of an
ending, but it is necessary to tie everything together in a way that flows to
the reader. Endings that have good continuity are endings that can tie together
the majority of the story leading up to the ending. For example, in The
Martian, almost everything that Mark Watney does in the story prepares him
for his final journey home. All of the preparation that he does during his time
on Mars: making food, rationing water and supplies, rebuilding and refurbishing
a rover, all prepare for his end goal. I think that a good ending makes use of
almost, if not all, of the story elements before it. A proper ending should use
the previous story elements in a combined fashion to produce a final product
that is the culmination of the story.
I believe that another very important part of an ending
is its accuracy. What I mean by that is that a story ending cannot contrive
plot devices or other details for the sake of the ending. Although these
details and devices may be created to make the ending flow smoother, they
undermine the accuracy and integrity of the ending. It is my belief that major
plot devices should not be introduced in the last few pages of a novel;
however, I am not against small details or obstacles in the way, as long as
they are accurately represented. For example, in The Martian, an
unexpected tear in the getaway ship’s makeshift canvas forces Mark Watney to
fabricate a makeshift bomb and fire the ship’s thrusters mid-fight to
counteract the effects of the broken canvas. The broken canvas is a small plot
device created to fuel the suspense of the ending, but it’s accurate. Technology
malfunctions all the time, and a makeshift canvas is one such example. Watney
then creates a makeshift bomb, which he has the capability to do, since he is a
botanist/chemist. These small plot devices are created and solved with accurate
solutions.
Finally, suspense is a very important tool, that when used
effectively, separates good endings from great ones. Take, for example, the
ending of The Martian (once again). As stated above, Watney’s ship’s
makeshift canvas breaks mid-flight, and he is forced to create a makeshift bomb
and fire the ship’s thrusters mid-fight to counteract the effects of the broken
canvas. The time between the canvas breaking and the problem getting solved is
a few pages of raw suspense, where the reader does not know what will happen
next. Nothing is certain for those few pages. Even after the canvas accident is
over, Watney is still just a bit too far away from the target ship. One of the
other crew members, Beck, goes out into space on a tether to physically catch
and save Watney. In the page or two where this decision is made, more suspense
is created for the reader. These two minor issues in the ending of The
Martian both create major suspense for the reader and fuel the ending to an
exciting, page-tearing masterpiece.
Great endings are about as much work as writing the rest
of the story. I believe that a great ending has three elements: continuity,
accuracy, and suspense. A great ending should use most, if not all, of the
story’s previous plot points, and tie them together in a culminating ending to
the story. A great ending should be accurate: major plot devices should not be
contrived to finish the story. Any small plot devices or details introduced
during the ending should hold accurate to the rest of the story elements.
Finally, a great ending should be filled with suspense. The reader should be
uncertain of the final outcome up until the end of the ending. To me, these
three factors, when combined, create an amazing story ending.
Matthew,
ReplyDeleteWith respect to the idea of "accuracy" in fiction, I think it's wise also to bring up the idea of a text being "accurate" in sff meaning something that might not mean scientific accuracy. After all, Ray Bradbury's characters walk on the moon without life support, safely, and it was known in his day that this wouldn't actually be possible. Instead, that's a detail that's 'accurate' to the kind of story he was writing, to his whole aesthetic. As THE MARTIAN's aesthetic is psychological-thriller-by-way-of-hard-sf-MacGyvering, it's vitally important for the character's plight to adhere to "accuracy" in a literal sense. In a fantasy story, or a different kind of sf, that accuracy might be more about being true to the rules of the world as already defined.
Best,
TT