Dear
Elsa Sjunneson-Henry:
Calling Things a Mary Sue is a Way of Shutting
Marginalized People Up
By:
Red Maier
I
remember the first time I was told I was writing a Mary Sue six years ago on
the now-defunct Miss Literati and I remember being devastated. I had never
before read a story that had represented me and had no romantic subplot within
my favorite fictional universe so I had decided to write my own. As a result,
here I was, being told that it was ‘weird’ and ‘didn’t appeal to the reader’
and that I, to my total chagrin, was a ‘Mary Sue’.
Mary
Sues, you see, were things to be avoided. They were throwbacks to the year 2005
and the wonderful Ebony Dark'ness Dementia Raven Way. Recanting self-inserts
and distinguishability in favor of being generic, many authors have felt
pressured into changing their characters to better suit critics and their
opinions. And, of course, the largest critics in the fiction world are often
those that feel entitled. They feel entitled to view themselves in every single
character they come across and feel personally victimized if they find someone
who is different from them.
However, I say, from
the bottom of my heart: screw that.
Writing
is supposed to be an outlet for the author, a form of creation. Reading is
supposed to be the same, but for the reader. By calling all specific, unique
characters Mary Sue’s, you not only limit the writer but also limit the reader.
By stifling that expression, you also force the genre to be bland and boring,
filled with generic neurotypical, able-bodied ansty white guys that swing
swords and get the girl. Historically, any step out of line of the norm has
been viewed as an immediate failure. Yet, as we can see by the success of media
such as the Percy Jackson series and Black Panther, diversity is a niche that
desperately needs to be filled.
By
not calling characters Mary Sue’s, you free the writer and the reader. No
longer is the writer forced to stifle parts of themselves in order to sate the
masses and no longer is the reader limited to reading stories that they do not
quite relate to. In addition, with exposure, diversity becomes normalized and
that can assist the breakdown of stereotypes and knee-jerk discrimination.
Children who grow up being represented in the media that they consume can
become more confident in their abilities to achieve and adults that are exposed
to media that represents them can feel more confident in their self-expression
and existence..
However,
a thing to keep in mind is the avoidance of extremism.
Do not send hate to
people who do write stories that can be viewed as mainstream. Yes, diversity is
important but that includes the mainstream stories. Everyone deserves a chance
to be represented, it’s just important to promote representation of
marginalized groups as they have never had that before.
Do not shut people out,
teach them. Ignorance is the fuel of hatred and missteps. In order for people
to understand why representation is important, they have to be taught the
history and the meaning of representation. If they are just needlessly yelled
at, they may foster hatred and disdain for the communities and spitefully lack
representation in their work. We are supposed to work together, not against
each other.
By discrediting writing
as Mary Sue’s, we discourage young new writers who are just starting as well as
shut out representation.
Red,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing this. I think one of the worst habits we have (whether in writing workshops or fan fic forums) is telling other people how they "should" do something (or not do something) in their writing. Often it comes from an innocent place, from a desire to help, but even then, it smacks of a One True Process for writers, and sets people up to worry that the things they want from their writing aren't allowed. Remembering that labels are used to describe things, but not necessarily define them absolutely, is an important first step to looking at writing in a less blinkered and limiting way.
Best,
TT