Dear
Elsa Sjunneson-Henry: The Term Mary Sue is Totally Overused
By
Sean Rabbitte
While the term “Mary Sue” has become sort of dry at this point,
I don’t think it would be a good idea to stop using the term all together as,
well, it’s a good descriptor of what a lot of people do. In non-professional
writing and occasionally in professional writing, certain authors will try and
write themselves an “Author Avatar” into the story because of ego, accident, or
just because that’s the story they want to write. However, it can not be
ignored that the term has become far overused. I personally find it amusing
whenever someone calls an author out for writing a “Mary Sue” into their story
when in reality the similarities between the author and character are circumstantial
or minor at best. People just notice the similarities and simply call “Mary
Sue” without even looking for possible reasons for the similarities. Take the work
of Elsa Sjunneson-Henry for example: many people seem to complain or disregard her
work because it often has to do with disabled female characters, as she herself
is. However, those criticizers don’t fully read into the story to realize that
that is the point of the authors writing: without those traits present in her
work, it would not be the same story at all, nor would it convey the same
message to the reader that is intended. After having read Elsa’s I Built My Own Godd*mn Castle (https://www.tor.com/2017/07/31/i-built-my-own-goddmn-castle/),
which she wrote for the Disabled People
Destroy Science Fiction anthology, it can be seen that her primary reason
for writing in so many disabled and female characters is not to insert herself
into the story or create an idealization of herself, but it is because she
wants there to be more fiction and literature in the world that focuses on
disabled characters. She does this because she thinks the world needs to be
able to read and experience these stories through the lenses of a disabled protagonist.
Another odd thing about calling an character similar to
an author a “Mary Sue” is that it makes sense for an author to write characters
they can actually relate to and understand the experiences of. In the past,
many people have written stories about characters that are not like them,
whether from different parts of the world then them or with different features,
and this has created a few problems. First, the character often ends up very
different from what the person would likely act or behave, which then leads to
disinterest or even anger from those in those who are like the character in
upbringing or traits. However, when the characters the author is writing about
are similar the author, these problems are a lot rarer because, well, the
author has experience with that lifestyle. While a non-disabled male can try to
write a story about a disabled female, an author like Elsa Sjunneson-Henry, who
IS a disabled female, will likely be able to write the same story but much more
accurate and realistic. Saying an character who has shared similar traits or
experiences with an author a “Mary Sue,” is really just silly because, well, the
more similar a character is to the author the more likely that character will be
written with real experience in mind. It’s because of this that I’ve felt that
the term has been overused for quite a while now, and really should only be
used when its clearly the author just inserting themselves into a story or when
a character has unexplained exceptional talent or power, because otherwise, the
word is just going to get thrown around to start flame wars on the internet. So
next time you go to call something a “Mary Sue,” make sure it fits the
situation beforehand.
Sean,
ReplyDeleteYour post suggests the much-maligned "Mary Sue" as a kind of antidote to the author who attempts to represent difference and does so poorly. Almost a kind of encouragement to stay in one's lane and focus on what one knows how to write, or at least to strive to better understand a difference before embracing a character who lives that difference. I think that's a responsible starting point for storytelling, on the whole, and hopefully one from which authors can build conscientious, interesting, and engaging fiction.
Best,
TT