Dear
Vina Jie-Min Prasad: Sacrifice Leads To Admiration
By:
Martin Filbert
I’m sorry. I can’t help it. I really do like Harry Potter, and so did the rest of the
kids I grew up with. But I have heard many a time that it is unoriginal to call
the Harry Potter series your favorite
books ever. So, call me unoriginal.
When it comes to endings, J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is
as close to perfection as humanly possible. This might seem too romantic, but I
love a happy ending. I want an ending to a fictional work in which all the
problems along the way are resolved once and for all. However, it is always
more fun when the main character must make a life-altering decision, or in many
cases a life-or-death decision.
A bit of background may be necessary now. Ever
since I was young, my father and I have watched war movies together. It was not
only a starting point to talking about world history, but our movie sessions
also served as a time for me to learn about my grandfather who fought in World
War II. The movies based upon the horrors of war imprinted upon me a respect
and admiration for those who sacrifice themselves for a greater purpose.
Therefore, when it came to the fictional works I read as a kid, I chose those
in which the main characters fought for a noble cause and were not afraid to
die in order to achieve their goals.
From this comes the reasoning for why Harry Potter delivers the “right” ending
for me. The main character gives the ultimate sacrifice: he chooses to die in
order to destroy the horcrux inside of him, making Voldemort much more
vulnerable. This ultimate show of bravery is really what allows me to determine
that it is a satisfactory ending.
Of course, in order to allow the main character
the opportunity to give a tremendous sacrifice in the hopes of achieving a
happier outcome, this means that there must be sufficient conflict in the text
to justify such a sacrifice, which I fear may be too specific for some works of
fiction. But when it comes to my personal taste, and drawing from the endings
of the fiction I devoured in my childhood, a sacrifice in return for a “better”
outcome for the rest of the characters is what I like to read. And not to
worry, many times this was not the sacrifice of a human life. For example, a
simple sacrifice – something like acknowledging a different viewpoint, relinquishing
a grudge, or resolving a toxic relationship – can tip the balance toward a more
favorable ending for the characters in the story.
Ultimately, in the fiction that I am most
familiar with, the responsibility often times falls upon the hero of the story
to make a sacrifice in order to achieve a happy ending for everyone involved. In
Harry Potter, the hero is Harry. But
also, it is Lupin, Tonks, and the multitude of other characters that died to
defeat Voldemort. From this I conclude that fiction can be an escape from our
ordinary lives, but it also can exemplify the sacrifices necessary in our world
for good to triumph over evil. Harry
Potter showcases in its ending that no one person can accomplish such a
task by themselves. The ultimate sacrifice may be required from many, as is the
case in war.
Maybe that is a bit morbid, but my point is
that a sacrifice can equate to the downfall of the wicked and happiness for all
those who survive. As long as Lupin and Tonks did not die in vain, I’m
satisfied.
Martin,
ReplyDelete(I don't think there's such a thing as having an unoriginal favorite. Haters gonna hate.)
Ahem.
I think that making sacrifice meaningful is critical to endings, too -- and may be part of the reason that some viewers were so dissatisfied with the ending of INFINITY WAR, for example. People need a sense of the bad being, if not offset totally, mitigated in some way or complicated by the good that emerges. Perhaps that's just because life itself never offers us anything that's totally without purpose or value.
Best,
TT