Dear Vina Jie-Min Prasad: Beyond Just
the Words
By Lindsay Beers
... and so, the prince and the underprivileged woman got
married and lived happily ever after!
Expected. We've all heard of stories with endings like the
above. They are predicted from a mile away, even if it's not so blatant about
it in stories such as Cinderella. Happy ending aren't so satisfactory without a
twist, or something to keep you thinking over after the story ends.
In Lord of Light by
Roger Zelazny, Sam and company did indeed get their wish of moving towards
Accelerationism, but that's not what makes the ending satisfying and
interesting. What got me giddy was the interactions between Sam and Taraka. Sam
was never a god, he says it himself. The concept of the divisions between human
and gods is, to me, the most fascinating part of the book. It is Taraka's
entire acceptance that Sam is a god, even when Sam blatantly denies it and lays
out the reasons he is oh so human, that has me occasionally thinking back to
the Lord of Light.
In endings, there can't be loose ends or frustrating
questions about the progression of the story afterwards. Sometimes this can go
well, a 'what actually happened' ending so to speak, but if it isn't
intentional and well thought out, it's just irritating. For an example, I bring
up Harry Potter by J. K. Rowling. In the end, Harry defeats Voldemort, and
everything is well ... or so you think. The scene cuts to the future, and Harry
has married Ginny, has children, with frankly questionable names, and
everything seems to be going right with the world. I don't actually think the
biggest issue has been solved. Sure, Voldemort was terrible, but there is a
reason I hated Umbridge so much more than Voldemort. The Wizard community of
Britain is corrupt and has so many issues. No one is denying that. What about people
like Remus Lupin? For being a werewolf, he had to leave his teaching position.
The Wizardry community treats non-humans like shit, and the mere fact that
something like Umbridge and the support of Voldemort could happen, makes me
think that there are more issues than just the corrupt minister of magic,
Cornelius Fudge. Cornelius, to me, was more of a symbol. A symbol of the
mindset the government takes.
A good ending is one that makes you want to see more of the
universe it created. After I've finished a story, I often find myself
daydreaming of different things that could happen in that world. Of course, the
bigger an impact a story had on me, the more I will do this. The endings can
make a story, and decide how much I enjoyed it. Tom Godwin's The Cold Equations wouldn't have had an
impact on me if the girl lived. Such an ending would have felt out of place, unlikely,
and against the theme of the story.
Complete immersion into a story and its world makes it incredibly satisfying, and such an extremely
important piece of the writing as the ending can decide how much I enjoyed the
it and how invested I am in it.
Lindsay,
ReplyDeleteYou make an important point about the ending of a story needing to address the story's real central issue. Voldemort is just the cape-wearing uber-manifestation of a hateful will to power; his ideological successors are the same people who think of house elves as property, werewolves as animals, and so on. It's much too easy for a text to address the evil that wears a cape and fail to address other things -- like, in "The Cold Equations," that dreadful final image of the girl's body floating away, and the ridiculous cruelty of a world with no margin for error.
Best,
TT