Dear Vina Jie-Min Prasad: Don’t Leave Me Hanging
By
Martha Galvez
One
of my favorite works of fiction that we have read as a class this semester is
“Cat Pictures Please” by Naomi Kritzer. I liked it a lot because it was simple
and not overly complicated like a lot of speculative fiction stories. This was
also true for the ending of it because it was very clear what had happened, and
the reader wasn’t left wondering about what had happened or what was going to
happen. I’ll avoid spoiling the ending but like I said, this story’s ending
satisfied me because the narrator, which was a form of AI, explicitly said what
was happening and what was going to continue to happen. There have been several
other stories that we have read in this class and that I have read in other
classes that leave the reader very confused and asking so many questions. I
know a lot of people I have talked to like this type of mysterious ending
because it gives room for the story to be different for each reader by filling
in the gaps with their own imagination. However, when a story ends like that
for me, it makes me almost mad because after all the time I spent reading the
story, I would like to be told exactly how it ends. It’s something that I might
go over and over again in my mind trying to figure out but to no avail because
I will never truly know what the author wanted the ending to be unless the
author actually wrote about it in the story.
Another
aspect of a satisfying ending for me is when the ending is completely
unexpected. I think most readers love it when the ending is something that they
never saw coming and is a huge surprise. I think the most traditional example
of this is the “Sixth Sense” because nobody ever sees the ending come. If I
were to write a story, I think I would come up with two completely different
story lines and then find a way to connect them so that the reader will never
be able to see the ending. Completely unexpected endings are the best entertainment
in literature in my opinion.
My
third and final aspect of an ending which makes it satisfying is a happy
ending. Of course there will always be sad stories and bad things will happen
in them, but when a book kills off the main character which is also the most
lovable and relatable, it is going to make the reader feel very upset about it
and might possible avoid any other work from the same author. There has been a
time when I was reading a book and one of my favorite characters died, after this
happened, I honestly just didn’t want to read anymore of it. Even though there
was only a couple pages left, it just didn’t feel worth it anymore. I lost the
person who I was rooting for so why was I going to read any more of it.
So
as I’ve said, the three most important parts of an ending to me are clarity,
unpredictability, and keeping the story relatively happy. The more the author
can say about the author can say about the ending, the better. I love knowing
as much as I can about what happens after the big conflict or whatever it is
that was happening throughout the story. An ending that can be seen since the
beginning of the story is not entertaining if it was in the reader’s mind the
whole time. Finally, nobody likes a sad story if it is unnecessary.
Martha,
ReplyDeleteIt seems like the common feature in the different, desirable types of endings you discuss is that they all offer real closure of some kind. Endings that are more "open" may not feel like they actually have endings at all... and perhaps that's why we're able to accept tragic endings? If it's clear that a happy ending is out of the question, we'll take tragedy, as long as it lets us know what the horizon looks like?
Best,
TT