Dear Vina Jie-Min Prasad: An Unsatisfying Send Off
By Jacquelyn Butler
The topic of well-done
endings is a subjective and spoiler filled question
(consider this your warning). One of the most well-done endings I’ve
read is Christopher Paolini’s Inheritance Cycle.
During the novel, Paolini did a great job
justifying each of the character’s fates and making them seem true to what we
knew about the character based on the information given to us throughout the series.
For example, throughout the series, we see the main character Eragon lamenting
the fact that his dragon, Saphira, is the last free dragon. So, when he finds a
vault full of unhatched dragon eggs, it makes sense that he would jump at the
chance to revitalize the Dragon Riders, even though he had to leave behind his loved
ones. Despite this not being the fairy
tale ending where the main characters all live out the rest of their lives
together, it feels satisfying because Paolini didn’t suddenly change styles or
make the main character do something that they wouldn’t normally do.
Even some of the minor characters in the novel
had endings that were well fleshed out and true
to them. Eragon’s companion Arya ended up becoming
the queen of Alagaësia’s elves and throughout the book series, she was built up
as very independent, caring more about the fate of her people than her
relationship with Eragon. Therefore, it made sense that at the end of the
series she stays behind to rule her people rather than joining Eragon in
leaving Alagaësia forever. Eragon’s half-brother Murtagh spends most of the
series in forced servitude to Galbatorix except for the end of the series in
which he helps Eragon defeat the evil king, so it makes sense that he elects to
spend his life on the outskirts of Alagaësia where people aren’t afraid of him
and he can live in peace with his dragon rather than live in fear for his life.
While these are not the unrealistically optimistic endings we’ve come to expect
from fantasy novels they feel true to the characters.
On the other side of the scale, there are some
book series that have endings that feel like they were started and finished in
the last half hour before the deadline. For example, one of my favorite book
series John Flanagan’s Ranger’s Apprentice had an ending that I felt was extremely unsatisfying because
it wasn’t true to the characters.
At the beginning of the series, we are
introduced to two orphans named Will and Alyss. Alyss is fleshed out a great
deal throughout the story, allowing us to feel close to her- but spoiler alert-
the author reveals to us at the beginning of the last book that she was killed
in a random tavern fire set by bandits during the time skip between the previous
book and the final one. This felt like an easy way to get rid of a character that
the author didn’t really know how to deal with and a quick way to spur on the
plot rather than writing the ending that the character deserved.
This was especially unsatisfying for me because
her death spurred the protagonist into a weird revenge quest that seemed like
it had little to nothing to do with the rest of the series. His actions were extremely
out of character, because throughout the series, Will maintains a steady stream
of humor, remaining determined despite the seemingly insurmountable odds. His abrupt
change to a jaded and apathetic character felt foreign from the orphan I
related to during the book’s precursors, as well as making the last book a lot
darker than its predecessors. As a reader this was extremely frustrating
because I spent a great deal of time reading and re-reading the series only for
the author to end it in a way that felt separate from the books I loved.
Overall, in my experience, most of the best
endings in fiction come from being true to the characters developed during the
series, rather than throwing together a plotline to maintain the attention of a
rapidly dwindling audience. Often, doing so destroys the feeling of escapism
readers often search for when reading. I enjoy picking up a new series to dive
into a world just as realistic and complex as the one I live in, so when an
ending does not feel true to the character it shatters the illusion that I’m in
another world, making the book unsatisfying.
Jacquelyn,
ReplyDeleteI really appreciate your point that endings need to resonate with characters, both in terms of their actions and who they are, and in terms of who they have become. Choices that are more about the convenience of the author tend to shine out as just that, rather than the inevitable and important final steps in a well-developed character's journey.
(My son plans to read Ranger's Apprentice this summer... I think I'll let him reach his own conclusions about the last book!)
best,
TT