Dear Elsa
Sjunneson-Henry: Accepting Opinions and Comments in the Modern Society
By Andrew Kim
Well,
this was an interesting question. It seemed very focused on calling things Mary
Sue’s, but I think the topic is related to a great many things that have an
effect on it. With Ms. Sjunneson-Henry being a disabled author, I feel I may
understand why she may be concerned with this idea.
To begin, I think it is relatively easy to tell if a
character is a Mary Sue. Something about the character or the story is very
off-putting. People want realistic stories that they can relate to and Mary
Sue’s are very idealized. Nobody wants to not be the “Mary Sue” and if the
story seems to be placing itself over the audience, the automatic defensive
reaction of the audience is to dislike the story. If a character is too
perfect, the natural reaction is suspicion and jealousy.
As for your point of mainly male authors, I feel that was
badly worded. There are many more factors in that aspect. As I mentioned
before, people may feel inferior from Mary Sue’s and since you write about
females, it may be the men’s natural human reaction that feel this more strongly.
If someone wrote about Marty Stu’s, then it may be the females who are pushing
back and arguing about this topic. I think we must begin analyzing this
question without premade assumptions or attempting to push a certain point.
Additionally,
I believe that yes, diversity is important, and it is important to have
different views. In that way, calling a story a Mary Sue is also in itself,
diversity. As you said, “listen[ing] to more diverse voices,” includes
listening to the people who call certain stories Mary Sue’s. Now, of course
there are people who are uneducated and call everything Mary Sue’s and whatnot,
and we should be careful with taking every comment with equal consideration. I
always say, take it into consideration, but don’t let it control you. I believe
everyone’s opinion can be taken into consideration to various degrees, but none
of them should be deciding how you yourself think. Thus, other people calling a
story a Mary Sue should not be hindering writers from writing with their own marginalization’s.
As
for this hindering, I think calling stories Mary Sues is like swear words or derogatory
terms. The importance on the word is the perceived importance people place on
it. I do not believe that we should get rid of calling things Mary Sues just as
we can’t simply get rid of a derogatory term. This is only a short-term goal
that doesn’t solve the complete problem. The eventual goal should be for the
term to lose its meaning. I remember watching a video (unfortunately, I can’t
find it), but the speaker talked about how there used to be an extremely
derogatory word in England back in the day comparable to the N word or the F
word for homosexuals today. However, now in the current world, nobody knows of
the word and thus, it lost its derogatory meaning. This should be the final
goal.
If anything, we need to try to understand why the word exists
and continues to exist in the modern society. As I mentioned above, calling
something a Mary Sue should not but does make writers feel less welcome, so I
agree it’s a problem. However, since we cannot simply get rid of it, we should,
as individuals, understand. And by understand, I mean to understand the word,
the opposite perspective, and the people behind it as well. For people’s
backgrounds determine their actions of calling things Mary Sues.
In conclusion, I do not believe we should simply end calling
things Mary Sue’s. There is a reason that term exists, and it is important to
understand why. Just as analyzing memes can tell us a lot about the modern
society, this term has a historical and cultural significance. Your original
point of diversity is the most important part of this argument. Calling
something a Mary Sue is diversity. Since calling a story a Mary Sue should not
have an impact on hindering their ability to publish, the audience should not
be forced to accept stories they do not enjoy because it may have Mary Sue
aspects. With the term Mary Sue, we can still listen to more diverse voices,
publish more diverse stories, and enable storytellers to write their own
marginalization’s. Mary Sue did nothing here.
Andrew,
ReplyDeleteThe idea that the importance of the word is the importance that we place on it is, at least, logically tenable. But it may also conveniently forget that some words are invested with a level of importance or meaning outside of our choices, and that imagining those meanings don't matter involves a level of mental gymnastics that puts the onus of "stop being offended!" on the person who is harmed. Consider various slurs or controversial words -- the n word, g word, w word, and what have you. Is it the job of someone on the receiving end of a term meant to degrade them to just get over it? Or is it the responsibility of people who share language and share space to recognize that they have the power to cause others harm with their language and strive to NOT do so consciously?
Best,
TT